COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CASE BASED LEARNING WITH TRADITIONAL TEACHING METHODS IN BIOCHEMISTRY FOR FIRST YEAR MEDICAL STUDENTS

Author:

Mahajan Ruhi1,Sharma Priyanka2,Gupta Rishabh3

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, ASCOMS And Hospital, Sidhra, Jammu, India

2. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, ASCOMS and Hospital, Sidhra, Jammu, India

3. Post Graduate Student, 2nd Year, Department of Surgery, ASCOMS and Hospital, Sidhra, Jammu, India

Abstract

Background: Case based learning (CBL), is a learning method aids learner to reorganize, elaborate their information and provide connection between current and new information. Moreover CBL is student centered, taken in small groups where teacher acts as facilitator or guide. This study was planned to perceive the need for initiating CBL, this study aimed to compare the biochemistry teaching among rst year medical students with that of traditional teaching. Methods This is an observational study conducted from August 2021 to December 2021. This research study was conducted on 99 students of First year MBBS students. Ten ideal case scenarios on the topic of protein energy malnutrition(PEM) in children and acid base balance were prepared, and pre validated by the faculty of Biochemistry, Paediatrics and Surgery medical education department in our institution. CBL was introduced and total three sessions were conducted and compared with traditional teaching. Results The mean (±SD) value of the score of gain in knowledge was 3.90±1.86 (n=99) for the batch of students who attended case based learning while the mean (±SD) gain in knowledge for the batch who underwent, traditional learning ( TL) was 2.60±2.29 (n=99). A paired t-test comparing didactic lectures with self-directed learning showed that the scores following didactic lectures were more compared to SDL and the results were statistically signicant. An unpaired t-test comparing case based learning to SDL also showed statistically signicant gain in knowledge following didactic lectures. Conclusion This study clearly showed that CBL is more effective over traditional teaching for our rst year MBBS students and for covering a wider area.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Reference24 articles.

1. Hiemstra R. Self-directed learning. In: HusenT, Postlethwaite TN, eds. The international encyclopedia of education.2nd edn. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1994.

2. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. 2001. Outcome project timeline_Working guidelines

3. http://www.acgme.org/outcome/project/timeline/TIMELINE_index_ frame.htm

4. Murad MH, Coto‐Yglesias F, Varkey P, et al.The effectiveness of self‐directed learning in health professions education: a systematic review. Med Educ 2010;44(11):1057-1068.

5. Ainoda N, Onishi H, Yasuda Y. Definitions and goals of self-directed learning in contemporary medical education literature. Ann Acad Med Singapore2005;34(8):515-519.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3