COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF SPIROMETRY PARAMETERS IN HEALTHY YOUNG AND ELDERLY ADULTS POPULATION IN PUNJAB, INDIA
-
Published:2021-06-01
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1-3
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJAR
Author:
Singh Ajay Pal1, Meena Kailash2, Singh Surinder Pal3, Kumar Avnish4, Shukla Ashish1, Bedi Renu5, Meena Kalpana6, Singh Kamaldeep1, Jyoti Jyoti1
Affiliation:
1. Junior Resident, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Government Medical College, Patiala 2. Senior Resident, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Government Medical College, Patiala 3. Profeesor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Government Medical College, Patiala, 4. Professor, Department of Physiology,Government Medical College, Patiala 5. Professor, Department of Community Medicine, JLN Medical College, Ajmer 6. Junior Resident, Department of Community Medicine, JLN Medical College, Ajmer
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Spirometry is a vital tool for the assessment of pulmonary function status. Spirometry can be used
to demonstrate the age-related decline in pulmonary function. The spirometry values can be used as reference values for a
particular age group. The aims of our study was to compare spirometry values between the young and elderly groups and evaluate age-related
changes in both groups.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 600 adults, which divided into two healthy groups: one was of
young adults (18-35 years), and other was of elderly adults (>60 years) of 300 persons, each taken over a period of one year, in the Department of
pulmonary medicine, a tertiary care hospital, Punjab. We conducted spirometry in both age group. Spirometry values were measured FVC,
FEV1, FVC/FEV1, PEFR, and FEF25- 75 % of each groups.The subjects were selected based on random sampling
RESULT: Spirometry values compared between young and elderly adults. Mean BMI in young and elderly groups was 25.09±2.87 and
25.82±2.45, respectively. Spirometry values in FVC , FEV1, FEV1/FVC , PEFR and FEF25-75% in young was 4.31± 0.18 , 3.84,± 0.88± 0.02,
9.87± 0.38 and 3.75 ±0.26 and elderly age group 3.01±, 2.60 ±0.85± 0.02, 7.70± 0.30 and 2.82 ± 0.26. On statistical analysis, p value <0.001 in
all spirometry parameters.
CONCLUSION: The study shows that there was a decline in spirometry parameters of healthy adults with the increase in age. This decline was
signicant in all spirometric parameters (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, PEFR, FEF25–75%) measured in the present study
Publisher
World Wide Journals
Reference21 articles.
1. Dey, A. (2017). World report on ageing and health. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 145(1), 150. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.207249 2. Spirduso, W., Francis, K., & MacRae, P. (1995). Physical dimensions of aging. 3. Miller, M. R., Hankinson, J., Brusasco, V., Burgos, F., Casaburi, R., Coates, A., Crapo, R., Enright, P., van der Grinten, C. P. M., Gustafsson, P., Jensen, R., Johnson, D. C., MacIntrye, N., McKay, R., Navajas, D., Pedersen, O. F., Pellegrino, R., Viegi, G., & Wagner, J. (2005). Standardisation of spirometry. In European Respiratory Journal (Vol. 26, Issue 2, pp. 319–338). Eur Respir J. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00034805 4. Cardús, J., Burgos, F., Diaz, O., Roca, J., Barberà, J. A., Marrades, R. M., Rodriguez-Roisin, R., & Wagner, P. D. (1997). Increase in pulmonary ventilation-perfusion inequality with age in healthy individuals. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 156(2 I), 648–653. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.156.2.9606016 5. JF, M. (1986). The Normal Lung. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders 1986 (1986th ed.).
|
|