LEARNING METHOD PREFERENCES AMONG ADOLESCENT MEDICAL STUDENTS IN SOUTH INDIA

Author:

P Kesava Kumar.1,M Lavanya.K.2,Mishra Sushant Kumar3,V Nageswara Rao.4

Affiliation:

1. Post graduate, nal year, Department of Community Medicine, GSL Medical College, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India.

2. Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, GSL Medical College, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India.

3. Professor and Head, Department of Community Medicine, GSL Medical College, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India.

4. Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, GSL Medical College, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adolescent medical students are freshly exposed to the medical subjects and the experience is entirely new and different compared to their earlier school learning. OBJECTIVES: To determine the preferences of learning methods among adolescent medical students and to determine which is the best method for learning different components. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It is a cross – sectional study conducted among the first year MBBS students in the class rooms of GSL Medical College, Rajahmundry for a period of three months using a standard pre – designed and pre – tested “VARK” questionnaire with learning methods as study variables. A class of 150 students was divided into 3 groups of 50 students each. They were initially taught about the different methods of learning by means of a lecture using power point presentation covering three sessions of 40 minutes each. Then, they were sensitized to the “VARK” questionnaire in the next session of 30 minutes and data was collected using the standard pre – designed and pre – tested “VARK” questionnaire. Time given to complete the questionnaire was 20 minutes. RESULTS: Among 134 adolescent medical students, 89 (66.13%) had completed 17 years age, 24 (17.91%) completed 18 years age, 14 (10.46%) completed 19 years age and 7 (5.2%) completed 20 years age. Mean age of students was 17.54±0.32 years. There were 77 (57.5%) females and 57 (42.5%) males. The students mostly preferred kinaesthetic style of learning. CONCLUSION: The present study emphasizes that different students have different learning styles and hence, using only one method of teaching may not benefit all the students.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3