Affiliation:
1. 3 year resident, Department Of Anaesthesia, Critical Care And Pain Medicine MGH Jaipur.
2. Professor in anaesthesia, Department Of Anaesthesia, Critical Care And Pain Medicine MGH Jaipur.
Abstract
Background: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is most widely recognized surgery done for management of chronic sinusitis. The aim
of this study was to compare the optimization of operating conditions produced by either 100 μg or 200 μg oral tablet clonidine as the mainstay for
circulatory manipulation during Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.
Method: A double-blind randomized comparative study was done in 60 cases divided into two groups. Group 1(n=30) patients were given 100 μg
tablet clonidine; group 2(n=30), patients were given 200 μg of tablet clonidine orally 1 hour 30 minutes before surgery with 75ml water.
Hemodynamic monitoring (HR, NIBP, SBP, DBP, MAP, SPO , ETCO ). Quality of bloodless surgical eld created intraoperatively was assessed2 2
by Fromme-Boezzart scale, Likert's scale at the end of procedure. Postoperatively, patients were assessed using Brussel's sedation score, and
adverse effects like Bradycardia, Somnolence, Delayed recovery were recorded.
Result: No statistically signicant difference seen in age, weight, gender, and ASA grading in both groups. Comparison of quality of surgical eld
created, assessment through Fromme-Boezzart grading system and Surgeon's satisfaction using Likert scale between both the groups was not
statistically signicant between the groups (P-value >0.05). We infer that both doses of clonidine tablets were equally effective in creating
bloodless surgical eld.
Conclusion: Non inferiority of 100microgram oral clonidine compared with 200 microgram oral clonidine for induction of hypotension during
FESS surgery with less side effects and creating an intraoperative blood less surgical eld.
Reference10 articles.
1. Jiwanmall M, Joselyn AS, Kandasamy S. Intravenous clonidine as a part of balanced anaesthesia for controlled hypotension in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomisedcontroled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61(5):418-423. doi:10.4103/ija. IJA_58_17
2. Ghorbani J, Arastou S, SafaviNaeini A, et al. Comparing the Effect of Oral Clonidine and Tranexamic Acid on Bleeding and Surgical Field Quality during Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol.2018;30(100):255-260.
3. Puthenveettil N, Rajan S, Kumar L, Nair SG. A comparison of effects of oral premedication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Anesth Essays Res. 2013;7(3):371-375. doi:10.4103/0259-1162.123244
4. Bhat Pai RV, Badiger S, Sachidananda R, Basappaji SM, Shanbhag R, Rao R. Comparison of surgical conditions following premedication with oral clonidine versus oral diazepam for endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomized, double-blinded study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016;32(2):250-256. doi:10.4103/0970-9185.182112
5. Jabalameli, M., Hashemi, S., Soltani, H., & Hashemi, S. (2005). Oral Clonidine Premedication Decreases Intraoperative Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Journal Of Research In Medical Sciences, 10(1), 25-30.