“COMPARISON OF PERIBULBAR ANESTHESIA WITH POSTERIOR SUBTENON'S ANESTHESIA IN MANUAL SMALL INCISION CATARACT SURGERY (MSICS)”
-
Published:2023-02-01
Issue:
Volume:
Page:21-23
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:ijsr
Author:
Tulasi R Yamini1, H M Lokesh2, Sagolsem Nivarani1
Affiliation:
1. Postgraduate, Department of Ophthalmology, Sri Siddhartha Medical College & Research Centre, Tumkur, Sri Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education, Tumkur, Karnataka, India 2. Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Sri Siddhartha Medical College & Research Centre, Tumkur, Sri Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education, Tumkur, Karnataka, India.
Abstract
Background: Cataract-related blindness is a huge problem in India, not only in terms of human suffering but also in terms of economic loss and
social impact. For cataract extraction, retrobulbar anaesthesia was widely employed. Because of its substantial difculties, retrobulbar anaesthesia
was replaced with peribulbar. Despite a two injection method Peribulbar anaesthesia has a very high failure rate. Subtenon's anaesthesia is
becoming more popular in this situation, Because of its faster onset in delivering anesthesia, akinesia and patient compliance. A cross- Methods:
sectional study in ophthalmology department at Sri Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur was conducted over a period of 18 months in 150
MSICS participants , with 75 participants in each group. The efcacy and safety of two types of anaesthesia in MSICS were compared in terms of
intraoperative analgesia, akinesia, lid movements, and complications. Out of Results: 75 participants in each group percentage with grade 0 pain
in posterior subtenon's group was 64(83 %) as compared to 6( 8%) in peribulbar group. Among all 20 (27%) participants of peribulbar group and 2
(3%) of posterior subtenon's group had attained complete akinesia. Both the groups had experienced similar amount of lid movements. Occurrence
of complications like chemosis and sub conjunctival hemorrhage was noted more in posterior subtenon's group when compared to peribulbar
group
Publisher
World Wide Journals
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Computational Mathematics,Applied Mathematics,Geometry and Topology,Algebra and Number Theory,Applied Mathematics,General Mathematics,General Computer Science,Applied Mathematics,Control and Optimization,General Mathematics,Applied Mathematics,Finance,Numerical Analysis,Applied Mathematics,General Mathematics,Applied Mathematics,Computational Mathematics,Analysis,Analysis
Reference6 articles.
1. Ashok A, Krishnagopal S, Jha KN. Comparison of peribulbar anesthesia with sub-tenon's in manual small incision cataract surgery. TNOA J Ophthalmic Sci Res 2018;56:67-70 2. Iganga ON, Fasina O, Bekibele CO, Ajayi BG, Ogundipe AO. Comparison of Peribulbar with Posterior Sub-Tenon's Anesthesia in Cataract Surgery Among Nigerians. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr-Jun;23(2):195-200. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.164609. PMID: 27162452; PMCID: PMC4845618. 3. Parkar T, Gogate P, Deshpande M, Adenwala A, Maske A, Verappa K. Comparison of subtenon anaesthesia with peribulbar anaesthesia for manual small incision cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 2005;53:255-9. 4. Datta, Abhijit, K. A. Ghosh, Sayan Basu, Kali Shankar Das, and Subhro Ghosal. “Exploring the anaesthetic options for manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS): A comparative evaluation of peribulbar, sub-tenon's and topical anaesthesia.” (2008): 82-83. 5. Deepthi PR, Amruth CK, Asritha B, Gowtami V. A comparative evaluation of sub‐Tenon’s anesthesia versus peribulbar anesthesia in manual small‐incision cataract surgery. Pan Am J Ophthalmol 2022;4:24.
|
|