A STUDY ON ACUTE UPPER GI BLEED WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO AIMS65 SCORE IN PREDICTING SHORT TERM OUTCOME.
-
Published:2022-12-01
Issue:
Volume:
Page:38-41
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:ijsr
Author:
Bey Prince1, Ch Hazarika Sarat2, S Konwar Siddhartha3, Kumar Das Tridip4
Affiliation:
1. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Medicine, Assam Medical College and Hospital. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Assam Medical College and Hospital. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Assam Medical College and Hospital. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Assam Medical College and Hospital.
Abstract
Background: Early risk stratication using validated prognostic scales helps in early decision making and triage in clinical practice. Objectives:
To evaluate ability of the AIMS65 score to predict mortality, length of hospital stay, requirement of blood transfusions and re-bleeding. Methods:
Patients with Upper GI Bleed age ≥ 13 years were taken up for the study. AIMS65 scores were calculated in 250 patients presenting with acute
Upper GI bleed by allotting 1 point each for albumin level <3mg/dl, INR>1.5, altered mental status (GCS<14), systolic blood pressure ≤
90mmHg, and age ≥ 65 years. Patients were categorized into low risk group (score of < 2) and high risk group (score of ≥ 2) based on the score.
Results: The predictive accuracy of AIMS65 scores ≥ 2 was high for in-patient mortality, length of hospital stay, requirements of blood
transfusions and re-bleeding. Of the total 250 patients, 75.2% had score < 2 and 24.8% had score ≥ 2. 7. 20% patients had re-bleed during the course
of hospitalization. 8.4% expired during hospital stay. Re-bleeding, in-patient mortality, requirement of blood transfusion and length of hospital stay
increased with increasing AIMS65 score. Conclusions: AIMS65 score is a simple, accurate, non-endoscopic risk scoring system. It helps in
stratifying acute UGI bleed patients into different risk groups at the initial stage. AIMS65 scores ≥ 2 predicts in-patients mortality, length of hospital
stay, requirements of blood transfusions and re-bleeding.
Publisher
World Wide Journals
Subject
Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Communication,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Transportation,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Molecular Biology,Molecular Biology,Structural Biology,Catalysis,General Engineering,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Process Chemistry and Technology,Catalysis,Process Chemistry and Technology,Biochemistry,Bioengineering,Catalysis,Cell Biology,Genetics,Molecular Biology,General Medicine
Reference18 articles.
1. Loperfido S, Baldo V, Piovesana E, Bellina L, Rossi K, Groppo M,et Al. Changing Trends in Acute Upper-GI Bleeding: A Population-Based Study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Aug;70(2):212-24. 2. Srygley FD, Gerardo CJ, Tran T, Fisher DA. Does This Patient Have a Severe Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed JAMA. 2012 Mar 14; 307(10):1072-9. 3. Savides TJ, Jensen DM. Gastrointestinal Bleeding. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ, editors. Sleisenger and Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.; 2016. p. 297–335. 4. Omar E El, McLean M. Gastroenterology. In: Ralston SH, Penman ID, editors. Davidson’s principles and practice of medicine. 23rd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Ltd; 2018. p. 763–844. 5. Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, Sung J, Hunt RH, Martel M, Sinclair P, International Consensus Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Conference Group.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jan 19; 152(2):101-13.
|
|