NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY (NPWT): OUR EXPERIENCE USING HOSPITAL WALL SUCTION
-
Published:2022-09-01
Issue:
Volume:
Page:35-38
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJAR
Author:
Mahadevuni Vishwanath1, Kumar V.R. Sujit1, Vinay Atluri Venkata1, Sabavath Deepthi2
Affiliation:
1. MS, Department of Orthopaedics, Mamata Academy of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India 2. MBBS, Department of Orthopaedics, Mamata Academy of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India
Abstract
Study Design: Prospective case series Delayed wound healing is a signicant concern, particularly in Introduction:
complex wounds and the elderly with co-morbidities. It leads to pain, morbidity, prolonged treatment, and requires major
reconstructive surgery, which imposes an enormous social and nancial burden. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) was used to cover
large wounds, decubitus ulcers, and open fractures that cannot be closed either primarily or secondarily and often require a complex
reconstructive procedure to protect the injury. NPWT is an alternative method of wound management, which uses the negative pressure to
prepare the wound for spontaneous healing or by lesser reconstructive options. We applied NPWT on pa Materials and Methodology: tients
with open fractures, decubitus ulcers, neglected wounds, fasciotomies, and large wounds. Compared to the patented VAC system, ours include
pre-sterilized PVA foam, cling drape (Surgiwear TM), nasogastric tube or an infant feeding tube, and a hospital wall suction. There Results:
were three cases of soft tissue injury of the foot with wound defect, one case of fasciotomy for compartment syndrome, one case of the decubitus
ulcer, one case of open fractures, and three cases of degloving injuries of the foot. In our study, the NPWT was changed every ve days, the
average number of NPWT changes was 3-4, length of time NPWT applied before the closure was 14-21 days. The most frequent coverage mode
is Split Thickness Skin Graft obviating the need for more complex aps and microvascular reconstructive procedures. Negative Conclusion:
pressure therapy stabilizes the wound environment, reduces wound edema/bacterial load, improves tissue perfusion, and stimulates granulation
tissue and angiogenesis. NPWT appears to be simple and more effective than conventional dressings for managing complex wounds, reducing
wound volume, depth, treatment duration, and cost.
Publisher
World Wide Journals
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Family Practice,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Sociology and Political Science,Soil Science,Environmental Chemistry,Statistics and Probability,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,Civil and Structural Engineering,Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Physiology
Reference21 articles.
1. Glass GE, Nanchahal J.The methodology of negative pressure wound therapy: Separating fact from fiction. J Plast Reconstruct Aesthet Surg.(2012) 65, 989e1001 2. N.K. Kanakaris a, C. Thanasas a, N. Keramaris, et al. The efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy in the management of lower extremity trauma: Review of clinical evidence. Injury, Int. J. Care Injured (2007) 38S, S8—S17. 3. Vikatmaa P, Juutilainen V, Kuukasja P, et al. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: a Systematic Review on Effectiveness and Safety. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2008) 36, 438e448 4. Lesiak AC, Shafritz AB. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. J Hand Surg.Vol 38A, Sept 2013.1828-32 5. Orgill D, Bayer L. Update on Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 127.Suppl: 105S, 2011.
|
|