ANALYSIS OF THE BASKA MASK VERSUS PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY SEALING PRESSURE IN PATIENTS POSTED FOR LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES UNDER GENERAL ANAESTHESIA

Author:

G R Manu1,A Kamat Chaitanya2,C Patil Manjunath3

Affiliation:

1. Assistant professor, Department of anaesthesiology, SSIMS & RC, T.begur, Bangalore

2. Professor, Department of anaesthesiology, JNMC, Belagavi

3. Professor, Department of anaesthesiology, JNMC, Belgavi

Abstract

Background: Airway management by anaesthesiologist has come a long way from the invention of endotracheal intubation. Invention of supraglottic airway devices (SAD) provided alternative airway, without hazards of direct laryngoscopy and intubation. First generation SAD was considered airway tubes, and hence modications were made to them. PLMA (Proseal laryngeal mask airway) is a second generation SAD which has a gastric port along with the airway tube. BASKA mask is a novel 3rd generation SAD. We designed this study to compare the clinical efcacy of BASKA mask and PLMA for time for insertion, ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure and complications in anaesthetised patients undergoing positive pressure ventilation under general anaesthesia. The present randomi Methodology: zed control trial was conducted in 60 ASA-1 and ASA-2, aged between 18-60 years posted for elective laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia. Patients were allocated into two equal groups, Group B-BASKA mask (n=30) and Group P- PLMA (n=30). All the data Collected were analysed. The demographic data, duration of insertion and airway sealing pressure were analysed using unpaired't' test. In our study we observed that, BASKA mask took lesser time to ins Results: ert in comparison to PLMA, the mean duration of insertion was 16.77±2.14 sec in BASKA Mask and 25.40±3.04 sec in PLMA Group. This difference was statistically signicant (p < 0.0001). The Mean airway sealing pressure was 33±2.31 cm of H2O in BASKA mask group and 27.00±1.84 cm of H2O in PLMA Group, after 5 min of insertion and 31.33±2.06 cm of H20 in BASKA Mask and 26.90±1.79 cm of H2O in PLMA Group after 5 min of pneumoperitoneum. The airway sealing pressure was more in BASKA group which was statistically signicant both after 5 min insertion and 5 min of pneumoperitoneum. There were no signicant mean airway sealing pressures between 5 min after insertion and 5 min after pneumoperitoneum in both the groups. The ease of insertion was more in BASKA mask but it was statistically insignicant. The Laryngopharyngeal morbidity score between these groups were statistically insignicant. To conclude, we observed that BASKA mask took lesser time to insert Conclusion: than PLMA in anaesthetized paralysed adult patients. Mean airway sealing pressure was higher in BASKA mask than PLMA. The ease of insertion was more in BASKA mask but it was statistically insignicant. The LPM score between these groups were statistically insignicant.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Chiropractics,Gastroenterology,Oncology,General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine,Pharmacology (medical),General Medicine,Literature and Literary Theory,Cultural Studies,Pollution,Water Science and Technology,Environmental Chemistry,Pollution,General Environmental Science,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Automotive Engineering

Reference16 articles.

1. Brimacombe JR, Brain AIP, Berry AM. The laryngeal mask airway: A review and practical guide. Great Britain: W.B Saunders Company Ltd; 1997.

2. Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, Wiener- Kronish JP, Young WL. Miller’s Anesthesia. 7th ed., Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010.

3. Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, Cahalan MK, Stock MC. Clinical Anaesthesia. 6th ed., Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.

4. Helmy AM, Atef HM, El-Taher EM, Henidak AM. Comparative study between i-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia 2010;4(3):131-6.

5. Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, Wiener- Kronish JP, Young WL. Miller’s Anesthesia. 7th ed., Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3