PREVALENCE OF ANTI-NUCLEAR ANTIBODY IN THE INDIAN POPULATION: A TERTIARY REFERENCE LABORATORY STUDY
-
Published:2022-10-01
Issue:
Volume:
Page:41-45
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJAR
Author:
Chadha Kirti1, Puranik Gururaj2, Sundharan Shimi1, Jatale Raj1
Affiliation:
1. Medical Affairs, Metropolis Healthcare Ltd, Mumbai India 2. Pathologist, Metropolis Healthcare Ltd, Mumbai India
Abstract
Background: Autoimmune diseases are known to be the third leading cause of fatality and morbidity amongst the
population of industrialized world. They account for 3-9% of health burden in general people, but information regarding
prevalence of autoantibodies and autoimmune diseases in developing nations is scarce. To study the prevalence of Anti-nuclear antibodies, Aim:
the total number and distribution of different tests used in the diagnosis of anti-nuclear antibody amongst Indian population, and correlate the
ndings from these tests with the clinical characteristics of the patients. Retrospective data was evaluated from a Global Reference Method:
Diagnostic Laboratory in Mumbai, for a period of 6 years. This included a total of 285095 cases tested for ANA. ANA-IFA and ANA-ELISA
were the screening tests used while ANA-ELISA Prole and ANA Blot were the conrmatory tests. ANA by IFA was the most preferred Results:
screening test (88.73%) and ANA by Blot was the most preferred Conrmatory test (67.13%) based on their sensitivity and positive predictive
value respectively. ANA-IFA showed positivity of 36.48% and ANA by ELISA test had positivity of 11.46%. In conrmatory testing, ANA Blot
showed a positivity of 31.90% and ELISA Prole had 23.36% positivity. Females showed signicantly higher positivity for both the screening
test and Conrmatory tests than males (p<0.001). Screening by ANA IFA and Conrmatory by Conclusion: ANA Blot was the most preferred
tests in our study population. These tests were found to be better for diagnosis, sub-syndrome categorization, prognosis, clinical follow-up and
therapeutic strategies in various autoimmune disorders.
Publisher
World Wide Journals
Subject
General Medicine,Organic Chemistry,Drug Discovery,Pharmacology,General Medicine,Law,Demography,Geochemistry and Petrology,Cell Biology,Genetics,Molecular Biology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Molecular Medicine,Immunology,Microbiology,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Anatomy,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Biomedical Engineering,Medicine (miscellaneous),Bioengineering,General Neuroscience,Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous),Pharmacology,Oncology
Reference37 articles.
1. Baronaite, R., Engelhart, M., Mørk Hansen, T., Thamsborg, G., Slott Jensen, H., Stender, S., & Szecsi, P. B. (2014). A comparison of anti-nuclear antibody quantification using automated enzyme immunoassays and immunofluorescence assays. Autoimmune diseases, 2014, 534759. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/534759 2. Biswas L, Bhattacharya S. (2020). The pattern analyses and prevalence of antinuclear Antibodies in the general population of the state of west Bengal: a cross sectional study. Indian journal of applied research.Volum-10|Issue-12|December-2020 3. Bizzaro N. (2020). Can solid-phase assays replace immunofluorescence for ANA screening?. Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 79(3), e32. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214805 4. Banhuk, F. W., Pahim, B. C., Jorge, A. S., & Menolli, R. A. (2018). Relationships among Antibodies against Extractable Nuclear Antigens, Antinuclear Antibodies, and Autoimmune Diseases in a Brazilian Public Hospital. Autoimmune diseases, 2018, 9856910. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9856910 5. Zandman-Goddard, G., Peeva, E., & Shoenfeld, Y. (2007). Gender and autoimmunity. Autoimmunity reviews, 6(6), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2006.10.001
|
|