Affiliation:
1. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, R.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain456006.
Abstract
Context:Infertility has risen to be a public health problem in India, National Family Health Survey (NFHS) – 4 estimates
showing 5.2% of the women in reproductive age group to be infertile. Infertility can be due to male factors, female factors
and in some cases unexplained; female factors comprising of 40-45% of the total cases. Amongst the female factors anatomical congenital
anomalies as well as acquired abnormalities of the reproductive tract may cause primary or secondary infertility.
Aims: This study aimed at looking at the distribution of congenital anatomical anomalies of the uterus and fallopian tubes as well as the
distribution of anatomical changes in uterus and fallopian tubes due to pathological conditions through Hysterosalpingograhy (HSG) in infertile
women.
Methods & Materials: 103 women attending Obs. and Gyneac. OPD for diagnosis and treatment of infertility in a tertiary care hospital in
Central India were selected in this observation study. Sampling was purposive. HSG was performed and the data was obtained from the
department of radiology. Descriptive analysis was done, and where applicable bi-variate analysis was done with chi-square test.
Results:There were 63 cases of primary (mean age = 25 years ± 3.2) and 40 cases of secondary infertility (mean age = 30 years ± 2.9). 24% of the
total cases had tubal occlusion, 16.5% had hydrosalpinx, 4% had arcuate and bicornuate uterus each and 1 % had unicornuate uterus, lling
defects in uterus, deviation of uterine cavity, T-shaped uterus and sub-mucous broid each. 47% of the cases had normal HSG ndings.
Conclusions: The results show that acquired causes of tubes were most common ndings in HSG of infertile women, pointing to preventable
and easily manageable cases of infections of reproductive tract. Timely management of such cases at primary health care level can help reduction
of infertility cases.
Reference15 articles.
1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertility and sterility;92(5):1520–4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19828144
2. WHO. DHS Comparative Reports 9: Infecundity, Infertility, and Childlessness in Developing Countries. 2004. p. 1–74.
3. Susan Krysiewics. Infertility in women: Diagnostic Evaluation With Hysterosalpingography And Other Imaging Techniques; AJR1992; 159:253-261
4. Jonathan S, Berek. Novak’s Textbook Of Gyneacology. 14th edition. USA:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2007; chapter 30: 1698.
5. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. 2017. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16: India. p. 101. Mumbai: IIPS