LIGHT WEIGHT VERSUS MEDIUM WEIGHT MESH IN LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA MESH REPAIR

Abstract

Hernia is repaired by laparoscopic or open approach. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs performed are trans-abdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) and totally extra-peritoneal repair (TEP). This study aimed to update the previous reviews and to compare Light Weight versus Medium Weight Mesh in LIHR. Previous studies have shown benets of LWM compared to MWM in terms of decreased pain, discomfort, and early return to normal activity. Method: 50 patients operated for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Mesh Repair were evaluated from Inpatient department of Sahyadri Speciality Hospital, Deccan, Pune between January 2020 to May 2021. 30 patients were operated using Anatomical 3D Light weight Mesh and 20 were operated using Paritene Flat Sheet Medium Weight Mesh; allocation done by simple randomization. It is a prospective, observational study. Aim was to evaluate the post-operative outcome and return to normal activities in LWM versus MWM in LIHR. Result: Mean duration of hospital stay, mean duration of days taken to resume daily activities, intensity of pain by VAS and NRS, foreign body sensation, incidence of seroma formation and inuence on male sexual life and fertility did not differ between patients of both groups. No signicant difference in post-operative pain and foreign body sensation between use of LWM and MWM.