COMPARISON OF MATERNAL AND NEONATAL OUTCOME IN FORCEPS VERSUS VENTOUSE ASSISTED VAGINAL DELIVERY IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF PMCH, PATNA, BIHAR

Author:

Kumari Archana1,Manju K.2,Jana Debarshi3

Affiliation:

1. MBBS, M.S. (Obs. & Gynae.), Assistant Professor, Department Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar.

2. Professor, Department Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar.

3. Young Scientist (DST) Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata-700020, West Bengal, India.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the maternal and neonatal outcome following ventouse and forceps- assisted vaginal deliveries in singleton term pregnancies. Study Design: A cross-sectional study. Duration and Place of study: It was conducted at the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department of Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar from May 2020 to December 2020. Patients and Methods: All patients who underwent instrumental vaginal delivery during this period, fulfilling the inclusion criteria were studied. Main maternal outcomes were perineal tears while the main neonatal outcomes were Apgar score at 1 minute and at 5 minutes after birth. Neonatal outcome included record of cephalhematoma, shoulder dystocia and need for admission to NICU. In addition to the above, maternal age, gestational age, parity and booking status were also recorded along with the indication for instrumental vaginal delivery for both ventouse and forceps delivery groups. Data was entered into SPSS-15. Percentages were calculated for all the above variables except maternal age and gestational age for which mean + SD were calculated. Chi -square test was used for qualitative variables to assess any difference between the two groups. P-value of equal to or <0.05 considered to be significant. Results: A total of 80 patients underwent ventouse delivery while 120 patients with forceps delivery were included. Mean maternal ages were 25.7+ 4.33 yrs and 25.05+3.47yrs in ventouse and forceps group respectively. 54(67%) and 95(79.16%) were primiparous in ventouse and forceps group respectively. 35(43.7%) were booked cases in ventouse group while this number was 53(44.2%) in forceps group. Fetal distress was the commonest indication of instrument application in 60(75%) and 108(90%) cases in ventouse and forceps group respectively. 16(20%) and 35(29.16%) neonates had Apgar score of <7 at 1 minute in ventouse and forceps group respectively. Apgar score of <7 at 5 minute was observed in 10(12.5%) of ventouse group while 14(11%) of forceps group. 2.5 % (n=2) and 1.66% (n=2) of neonates had shoulder dystocia in ventouse and forceps group respectively. Cephalhematoma was observed in 4(5%) of ventouse group while it was 1.5% (n=2) in forceps group. 11% (n=9) and 10% (n=12) of neonates admitted to NICU in ventouse and forceps group respectively. No case of maternal 3rd degree perineal tear observed in ventouse group while 3(2.5%) of patients had 3rd degree perineal tears in forceps group. Conclusion: Forceps deliveries are more associated with maternal morbidity while neonatal trauma is commoner among those delivered by vacuum extraction however there seems to be no difference in neonatal admission to NICU.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Reference16 articles.

1. 1. Walsh J, Murphy DJ. Operative vaginal delivery- a dying art? Recent advances in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 24. 1 Wimpole street, London W1G 0AE, UK. Royal society of medicine press Ltd.2008. P.75

2. 2. Ambreen A , Anwar K, Ayub MR, Rashid N. Comparison of Neonatal and Maternal Outcome between Forceps and Vacuum Delivery. Pakistan Journal of medical and health sciences.vol.5, issue.4, Oct-Dec 2011.

3. 3. Arshad H, Baqai S, Abdullah KN, Iftikhar B. Neonatal outcome with instrumental vaginal delivery: a study at PNS Shifa. pakistan Armed forces Medical Journal 2011; 2 June ISSN 0030-9648.

4. 4. N Prspas, I kalogiannidis, S Masoura, et al. Operative vaginal delivery in singleton term pregnancies: Short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes. Hippokratia. 2009 Jan-Mar; 13(1): 41–45.

5. 5. Olszewski J, Olszewska H, Królikowska B, Preis K. The analysis of complications in forceps delivery in Institutute of Obsterics and Women Disease Medical University of Gdańsk. Ginekol Pol. 2006; 77(9):700-4.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3