COMPARISON BETWEEN BISAP SCORE AND BALTHAZAR SCORE IN PROGNOSIS OF ACUTE SEVERE PANCREATITIS

Author:

Ibrahim Basil1,N Koppad Sanjay2,Suleman Mohd3

Affiliation:

1. Postgraduate, Department of General Surgery, Yenepoya Medical College Hospital, Deralakatte, Mangalore, India- 575018

2. Professor, Department of General Surgery, Yenepoya Medical College Hospital, Deralakatte, Mangalore, India- 575018

3. Senior Resident, Department of General Surgery, Yenepoya Medical College Hospital, Deralakatte, Mangalore, India- 575018

Abstract

Background Among the surgical causes of acute abdomen of non- traumatic origin pancreatitis is considered second most severe pain related problem preceded by abdominal colic. In view of this it was decided to carry out to study to compare the Balthazar scoring system with the BISAP scoring system so that this study could help in supplementing the existing data and compare the superiority of scoring system over other. The objective of the study was to compare the BISAP (Bedside index of severity in acute pancreatitis) and Balthazar scoring system in evaluating the prognosis in cases of acute severe pancreatitis. MethodsIt is a prospective study carried out between October 2018 to October 2020 documenting the events of 28 patients admitted with acute pancreatitis at a tertiary care centre. BISAP score and BALTHAZAR scores were calculated as per criteria highlighted in the literature. At the end of study period the scores were compared based on patient morbidity, mortality and treatment outcomes across various variables. Results There was a signicant association between BISAPScore and outcome with a p value 0.0211 at BISAP Score mortality was 14.3%. BISAP had a sensitivity of 92.00% and specicity of 50.00%. Balthazar at grade 4 had a sensitivity of 93.70% and specicity of 50.00%. A CTSI score of 7 had sensitivity of 95.65% and specicity of 50.00%. 82% of the subject were diagnosed as alcoholic pancreatitis and 17.9% had gall stone pancreatitis. Mortality rate in the present study was 3.57%. ConclusionWe conclude that both the BISAPand Balthazar score are good to assess the prognosis of patients. Both have an almost equal accuracy and specicity, but sensitivity of Balthazar 93.70% is better than BISAPof 92.00%.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Subject

Agronomy and Crop Science,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Bioengineering,Food Science,Biotechnology,Biochemistry,Catalysis,Biotechnology,Cell Biology,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry,Biophysics,Biochemistry,Biochemistry,Biomedical Engineering,Environmental Engineering,Bioengineering,Biotechnology,Genetics,Molecular Biology,General Medicine,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Biochemistry,Cell Biology,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry,Biochemistry,Organic Chemistry,Molecular Biology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,General Medicine,Biochemistry,Analytical Chemistry,Biotechnology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3