COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN MASS CLOSURE AND LAYERED CLOSURE OF MIDLINE ABDOMINAL INCISIONS AT DMCH, LAHERIASARAI, BIHAR

Author:

Kumar Ravi Ravindra1,Prasad Vijay Shankar2,Jana Debarshi3

Affiliation:

1. MBBS, M.S. (Gen. Surgery), Senior Resident, Upgraded Department of Surgery, Darbhanga Medical College and Hospital, Laheriasarai, Bihar

2. MBBS, M.S. (Gen. Surgery), Ph.D., FICS, Associate Professor and Head of Department, Upgraded Department of Surgery, Darbhanga Medical College and Hospital, Laheriasarai, Bihar.

3. Young Scientist (DST), Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata-700020, West Bengal, India

Abstract

Background: Traditionally, a laparotomy wound is closed in layers co-opting the various layers anatomically. A new method of closure, namely single layer closure technique (mass closure technique) has come into vogue. Aims: This study aims to evaluate the benets or otherwise between single layer closure and layered closure after comparing it with studies available in literature. Settings and Design : This study was conducted at Upgraded Department of Surgery, DMCH, Laheriasarai, Bihar, in patients undergoing laparotomy, either planned or emergency. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 cases were selected at random and the study was carried out over a period of 2 years. The cases were equally divided into two groups of 40. In both groups, vertical midline incision was used. In the rst group, abdomen was closed using the single layer closure technique. Continuous suturing with burial of the knots was done in 20 patients and interrupted mass closure was done in another 20 patients. In the other group, the abdomen was closed in layers. The patients were followed up for minimum 6 months. Patients who did not turn up for follow up were asked to notify the development of any wound complication through postal correspondence. Results: The time required for closure was considerably less when continuous suture technique was used. One patient in the mass closure group and four in the layered group developed post-operative wound infections. One patient in the layered closure group developed a stitch sinus. There were two cases of burst abdomen with the layered closure technique. Two patients in the layered closure group developed incisional hernias 6 months post-operatively. Conclusions: Single layer closure technique offers certain denite advantage over the layered closure technique with respect to the time required for closure of the incision, incidence of wound dehiscence and the incidence of incisional hernia. However, the true incidence of wound dehiscence (burst abdomen) and incisional hernia cannot be drawn since the study was of short duration and the number of cases was small without a long follow up.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Reference11 articles.

1. Aries LJ. Experimental study with synthetic fibre as a buried suture. Surgery 2011;9:51-60.

2. Bucknall TE, Ellis H. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid. Surgery 2011;89:672-7.

3. Domball FT, Hill GL, Horrocks JC. A controlled clinical trial of three methods of closure of laparotomy wounds. Br J Surg 2005;62:823-9.

4. Dudley HA. Layered and mass closure of the abdominal wall. Br J Surg 2010;57:664-7.

5. Ellis H, Heddle R. Closure of the abdominal wound. Br J Surg 2007;64:733-6.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3