“A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE FOLLOWING LARYNGOSCOPY AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION: DIRECT VERSUS VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY”

Author:

Shrivastava Ankit1,Chilke Devashri2,Kumar Nishant3,Jana Debarshi4

Affiliation:

1. MBBS, DNB Durgapur Steel Plant Hospital

2. M.D. Anaesthesiology , Durgapur Steel Plant Hospital, Durgapur , West Bengal 713205

3. MS (ENT) , Consultant The Mission Hospital, Durgapur

4. Young Scientist (DST) Department Of Gynecology and Obstetrics Institute Of PostGraduate Medical Education And Research, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata-700020, West Bengal, India

Abstract

Introduction: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation are the two essential procedures when general anaesthesia is administered to a patient. Adverse responses in the cardiovascular, respiratory, and other physiological systems can be provoked due to the noxious stimuli produced by laryngoscopy and intubation.1 During general anaesthesia maintenance of airway and ventilation can be done in various ways. Aims & Objectives: To assess the superiority of video laryngoscopy over direct laryngoscopy using baseline parameters like heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure. Materials And Methods: Interventional, Randomized study. Operation theatre of Durgapur Steel Plant Hospital, Durgapur, West Bengal. Adult males and females, ASA physical Grade 1 and 2 patients, scheduled for elective surgeries, under General Anesthesia, requiring or tracheal intubation. 1 year. From February 2018 to February 2019. Result And Analysis:In Group-A (MDL), 28(56.0%) patients had MPG 1 and 22(44.0%) patients had MPG 2. In Group-B (KVVL), 29(58.0%) patients had MPG 1 and 21(42.0%) patients had MPG 2. Association of MPG vs. group was not statistically signicant (p=0.8399). In Group-A (MDL), the mean time taken for intubation (mean±s.d.) of patients was 34.5600 ± 2.3661. In Group-B (KVVL), the mean time taken for intubation (mean±s.d.) of patients was 20.4000 ± 1.7728. Distribution of mean time taken for intubation vs. group was statistically signicant (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Also, Kingvision video laryngoscope offered less intubation time and reduced hemodynamic responses in patients with ASA grade 1and 2 as compared to Macintosh laryngoscope. So further study can be done on patients with difcult airways (III-IV) and with different co morbidities (ASA 3,4, E) to evaluate whether using Kingvision video laryngoscope can be advantageous in reducing intubation time and obtunding hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3