“A PROSPECTIVE STUDY: ROLE OF TRACTION ON FOLEY’S CATHETER IN TURP PATIENTS”-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

“A PROSPECTIVE STUDY: ROLE OF TRACTION ON FOLEY’S CATHETER IN TURP PATIENTS”

Published:2021-03-01 Issue: Volume: Page:27-29
ISSN:
Container-title:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
language:en
Short-container-title:ijsr

Author:

Lavania Prashant¹,Gupta Ankush²,Chaudhary Rahul³

Affiliation:

1. MS, M.Ch Urology, DNB Genito-urinary surgery, Professor, Head of division of Urology, Department of General Surgery, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra (U.P.).

2. MS, M.Ch Urology, Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra (U.P.).

3. JR III, Department of General Surgery, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra (U.P.)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common condition affecting men those are 50 years of age and above.TURP is still the widely used technique for management of BPH. TURPwith advent of newer technologies in diathermy and visual scope, has turned into a relatively safe one. AIM:To study role of catheter traction on blood loss and complications in patients with TURP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was done among patients of BPH admitted in the Department of Surgery at S.N. Medical College, Agra during the period from January 2019 to February 2020. Total 60 cases were enrolled in the study and divided into two groups. Group A(30 patients) with traction on catheter after TURPand Group B(30 patients) without traction on catheter. DISCUSSION: Blood loss and irrigation uid was signicantly less in the group with traction on foley's catheter. Duration of hospital stay and complications were also lesser in group with traction. CONCLUSION: Traction on foley's catheter post TURP is effective in managing BPH with the merits of higher safety due to less blood loss and early discharge.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Reference16 articles.

1. Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, et al. The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol1984;132:474–9.

2. Chute CG, Panser LA, Girman CJ, et al. The prevalence of prostatism: a population- based survey of urinary symptoms.JUrol 1993;159:85–9.

3. Reynard JM, Yang Q, Donovan JL, et al. The ICS-‘‘BPH’’ Study: uroflowmetry, lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction. Br J Urol 1998;82:619–23.

4. Botker-Rasmussen I, Bagi P, Balslev Jorgensen J. Is bladder outlet obstruction normal in elderly men without lower urinary tract symptoms? NeurourolUrodyn1999;18:545–52.

5. Boyle P, Robertson C, Mazzetta C et al. The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms in men and women in four centres. The UrEpik study. BJU Int; 2003 92:409–414.