Affiliation:
1. Senior Robotic Consultant, Department of Urology, Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, Kolkata
2. Department of Urology.
3. Apollo Hospital.
4. Young Scientist, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata.
Abstract
Introduction: Minimally invasive surgical procedures have gained widespread acceptance in the eld of living kidney donation over the last
decade. Ratner et al. were the rst to describe laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Since then, compared to open donor nephrectomy, LDN has
demonstrated several improvements in terms of decreased postoperative pain, decreased length of hospital stay (LOS), rapid patient rehabilitation,
reduced postoperative blood loss, and superior cosmetic results.
Aims And Objective: The aim of this study is to study less complication in robotic Donor nephrectomy with Respect to clinical outcome which
include pordoprade pain, time and minimal stay in hospital.
Materials And Methods: This study had been conducted on patients admitted for Robotic Donor Nephrectomy. This study done at Apollo
Gleneagles Hospital, Kolkata. Prospective study was carried out in cases performed between which includes number of patients. All patients were
older then 20years for this study.
Result And Analysis: It was found that 49 (96.1%) patients had under vein group1, and 2(3.9%) patient had under vein group 2. 43 (84.3%)
patients had under artery group1, and 8(15.7%) patient had under artery group 2. 1(2.0%) patient had acute graft rejection. 41 (80.4%) patients had
Left site, and 10(19.6%) patient had Right site.
Conclusion:Robotic donor Nephrotomy performed by the vinei Robot the use 7 Robot allows Minimum blood loss, Minimum OT time in their
better result our study proven the ruperiority 7 then method and add then there were less complication. Pastopade pain Duration of hospital stay was
less and return to regular life earlier so therefore Robot arrited Donor Nephrotomy is the method I choice for Renal tramplant Surgery.
Reference14 articles.
1. Ratner L.E., Ciseck L.J., Moore R.G., Cigarroa F.G., Kaufman H.S., Kavoussi L.R. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 1995;60(9):1047–1049. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Leventhal J.R., Deeik R.K., Joehl R.J., Rege R.V., Herman C.H., Fryer J.P. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy--is it safe? Transplantation. 2000;70(4):602–606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Pradel F.G., Limcangco M.R., Mullins C.D., Bartlett S.T. Patients' attitudes about living donor. transplantation and living donor nephrectomy. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2003;41(4):849–858.
4. Horgan S., Vanuno D., Sileri P., Cicalese L., Benedetti E. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2002;73(9):1474–1479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Renoult E., Hubert J., Ladrière M., Billaut N., Mourey E., Feuillu B. Robot-assisted laparoscopic and open live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison of donor morbidity and early renal allograft outcomes. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2006;21(2):472–477.