A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF NAILING VS. PLATING IN PATIENTS HAVING FRACTURE SHAFT HUMERUS
Author:
Amul Kaushik Kumar Modi1, Kumar Pathak Susheel2, Garg Uttam3, Seervi Rakesh4
Affiliation:
1. Junior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics,Career Institute of Medical Science and Hospital,Lucknow, India. 2. Professor, Department of Orthopaedics,Career Institute of Medical Science and Hospital,Lucknow, India. 3. Professor, Department of Orthopaedics,Career Institute of Medical Science and Hospital,Lucknow,India 4. Junior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics,Career Institute of Medical Science and Hospital,Lucknow, India
Abstract
Introduction: Fractures of shaft humerus are those fractures which lie distal to the surgical neck of the
humerus and proximal to the supra-condylar ridge distally. Conservative management of fracture shaft
humerus yield in satisfactory results in most of the cases. Dilemma between dynamic compression plating and ante grade
intra-medullary nailing occurs when a surgery is indicated. In this study, we aim to p Objectives: resent a comparative analysis
of two series of patients operated with dynamic compression plating and ante-grade intra-medullary interlock nailing
respectively with focus over their functional outcomes, complications and other important parameters. A total of 32 Methods:
patients with fracture shaft humerus were treated surgically. 17 were subjected to plating and 15 were subjected to intramedullary nailing. Functional outcome of patients was recorded using Constant and Murley score along with other parameters
such as duration of surgery, intra-operative blood loss, complications, and union time. Treat Results: ment with plates in this
comparative study led to a better ROM in the shoulder and fewer complications. Loss of shoulder motion may be expected after
humeral shaft osteosynthesis. However, the functional scores and the healing index can be good and excellent with both
techniques. In this comparative study, treatment with plates led to a better ROM in the s Conclusion: houlder and fewer
complications. However, functional scores and healing rates can be good and excellent with both techniques. A loss of
shoulder motion may be expected after humeral shaft osteosynthesis. Prospective studies are necessary with a long-term
follow-up to strengthen these ndings.
Publisher
World Wide Journals
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Computers in Earth Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Engineering (miscellaneous),Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Instrumentation,Geography, Planning and Development,Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Communication,Cultural Studies,Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Cultural Studies,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computer Networks and Communications,Hardware and Architecture,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Software,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials,Dermatology,Surgery,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Hardware and Architecture,Condensed Matter Physics,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials,Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials,Cell Biology,Plant Science,Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference13 articles.
1. Rose SH, Melton LJ, Morrey BF, Ilstrup DM, Riggs BL. Epidemiologic features of Humeral fractures. Clin Orthop 1982; 168; 24-30. 2. Leutenegger A, Bereiter H, Endrizzi D, Ruedi T. Plate osteosynthesis in humeral shaft fractures. Indications and results. Helv Chir Acta. 1989 Jun; 56 (1-2); 245-8. 3. Rodriguez. Fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamic compression plate or intramedullary nail. J. Bone Joint Surg (Br)Volume 82-B (7), September 2000, p 1085 4. Ruedi T, Moshfeigh A, Pfieffer K, Allgower M. Fresh fractures of the shaft of the humerus.- Conservative or operative treatment? Reconstion Surg and trauma. 14. 65-74. 1974 5. Bell M.J, Beauchamp, Kellam JK and Mc Murtry. The Results of Plating Humeral Shaft Fractures in Patients with Multiple Injuries, the Sunny Brook Experience. JBJS Am 1985; Vol – 67; 293-296.
|
|