“A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ALCAFTADINE 0.25% VERSUS OLOPATADINE HYDROCHLORIDE 0.2% IN ALLERGIC CONJUNCTIVITIS AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL”
-
Published:2022-12-01
Issue:
Volume:
Page:34-37
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:ijsr
Author:
K Akila1, Sridhar Sriya2, Sridhar Swetha3, Jayanthi C.R.4
Affiliation:
1. Post graduate student, Department of Pharmacology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Dept. of Ophthalmology, RRMCH, Bangalore; Former Fellow in Cornea and Refractive surgeries, Minto Ophthalmic hospital, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, BMCRI, Bangalore 3. Fellow in Dermatosurgery, Department of Dermatology, BMCRI, Bangalore. 4. Dean cum Director & Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Abstract
Background: Ocular itching is the hallmark symptom of allergic conjunctivitis, accompanied by tearing, conjunctival redness, eyelid swelling and
chemosis. Alcaftadine and Olopatadine hydrochloride are classied as dual-acting antiallergic agents, used in treatment of Allergic conjunctivitis.
Objective: To compare efcacy and safety of Alcaftadine 0.25% and Olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% eye drops among patients with allergic
conjunctivitis. Ophthalmology out-patient department at Minto Ophthalmic Hospit Settings and Design: al, Bangalore Medical College and
Research Institute, Bengaluru; prospective, randomized, comparative study. This study Methods and Material: was conducted among 120
patients suffering from grade 3 Allergic Conjunctivitis and efcacy measured in terms of proportion of patients achieving symptomatic relief of
allergic ocular signs and symptoms from grade 3 to grade 0 from baseline to 2 weeks, using TOSS score (Total Ocular Symptoms Score) and
Conjunctival Hyperaemia scale. Safety assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse effects. Continuous data assessed by unpaired, paired
't' test and repeated measures-ANOVA and categorical data by chi-square test. p-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically signicant, whereas <
0.001 as highly signicant. Greater proportion of patients achieved symptomatic reli Results: ef in Alcaftadine group (98.3%) compared to
Olopatadine hydrochloride group (90%) at end of 2 weeks. A signicant and faster reduction in TOSS score was observed from baseline to 2 weeks
in Alcaftadine treated group compared to Olopatadine hydrochloride group (p<0.05). Adverse events reported were headache, burning sensation
and mild redness in both groups Alcaftadine 0.25% demonstrated greater efcacy in reduci . Conclusion: ng ocular signs and symptoms of Allergic
conjunctivitis from baseline to 2 weeks, compared to Olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% with minimal side-effects.
Publisher
World Wide Journals
Subject
Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Communication,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Transportation,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Molecular Biology,Molecular Biology,Structural Biology,Catalysis,General Engineering,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Process Chemistry and Technology,Catalysis,Process Chemistry and Technology,Biochemistry,Bioengineering,Catalysis,Cell Biology,Genetics,Molecular Biology,General Medicine
Reference13 articles.
1. Collum L, Kilmartin DJ. Acute Allergic Conjunctivitis. In: Abelson MB, editor. Allergic diseases of the eye. Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders Co; 2000.pp.108-132. 2. Ackerman S, Smith LM, Gomes PJ. Ocular itch associated with Allergic conjunctivitis: latest Evidence and Clinical Management. Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease.2016;7(1):52-67. 3. Gong L, Sun X, Qu J, Wang L, Zhang M, Zhang H, et al. Loteprednol etabonate suspension 0.2% administered QID compared With Olopatadine solution 0.1% administered BID in the treatment of Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis: A multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients. Clinical Therapeutics. 2012;34(6):1259-1272. 4. Chigbu DI, Coyne AM. Update and Clinical utility of Alcaftadine ophthalmic solution 0.25% in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2015; 9(7):1215-25. 5. Borazan M, Karalezli A, Akova YA, Akman A, Kiyici H, Erbek SS. Efficacy of olopatadine HCI 0.1%, ketotifen fumarate 0.025%, epinastine HCI 0.05%, emedastine 0.05% and fluorometholone acetate 0.1% ophthalmic solutions for seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a placebo-controlled environmental trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87(5):549–554.
|
|