Affiliation:
1. Medical Superintendent, Sub district Hospital, Kavathe Mahankal, Sangli, Maharashtra.416405.
2. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Zydus Medical College and Hospital,Dahod, Gujarat
Abstract
Introduction: The incidence of burns, their treatment and rehabilitation process have a considerably marked effect on
children in both physical and psychological terms. Disruption of homeostatic and barrier functions leaves the underlying
tissues highly susceptible to infection. Such local infections, when left unchecked, can quickly result in systemic infection. In the present study
discussion on the common infections and the causative organism and its effect on the outcome of the burn patient studied. Aim and Objectives:
The aim of the study to nd out the common infection in burn injury wound and study the common factors precipitating complications in burn
injury. Materials and Methods: The Data was collected from 86 paediatric patients less than 15 years admitted in GMC, Miraj, Maharashtra
during the period from September 2014 to September 2016. The lab investigations were done periodically and as and when required, time to time
including Hemoglobin, complete blood count, blood sugar level, blood urea level, serum creatinine, HIV Status, hepatitis B status and weakly
wound swab culture were done. Observations and Results: In our study a total of 83 patients, almost 32(38.5%) of admitted patients had
developed infections and the most common developed infection in the burning patient was wound infection. The most common organism
isolated was Coagulase negative staphylococci 18 cases (21.7%) followed by klebsiella Pneumonia in 6 cases. No organisms seen in 51 cases.
The coagulase negative staph sensitive to cefoxitin and klebsiella Pneumonia sensitive to imipanum. Conclusion: Gram-negative bacteria were
the commonest pathogens followed by gram-positives and then fungi. In additional, MRSA was the commonest frequent gram-positive bacteria
detected and it is the major cause for infection. Fungal and Gram-negative colonization more associated with higher TBSA burnt and prolonged
hospitalization. We recommended that regular microbial surveillance of burn patient and hospital Environment microbiological surveillance of
potential nosocomial pathogens indicated inanimate environment of patients should be done to nd out the presences of our pathogens which are
contaminated
Reference7 articles.
1. Church D., Elsayed S., Reid O., Winston B., Lindsay R. Burn Wound Infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006; 19:403–434.
2. H S. Bacterial Profile of Paediatric Burn Wounds and their Antibacterial Sensitivity Patterns. Journal of Surgery2016; 2(2):1-5.
3. Branski LK, Al-Mousawi A, Rivero H. Emerging infections in burns. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2009; 10 (5):389‒397.
4. Weber J, McManus A. Infection control in burn patients. Burns. 2004; 30(8):A16‒24.
5. Ghai S, Sachdeva A, Mahajan R, et al. Bacteriological and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Aerobic Burn Wound Isolates at a Tertiary Care Institute in Northern India. Journal of Applied & Environmental Microbiology. 2015;3(4):95‒100.