STUDY OF PLEURAL FLUID TO SERUM CHOLINESTERASE RATIO TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN TRANSUDATE AND EXUDATE AND ITS CORRELATION WITH LIGHT'S CRITERIA

Author:

MR Manohar1,Shetty Deepti2,VM Vikram3

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, AIMS, BG Nagar.

2. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, AIMS, BG Nagar.

3. Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, SSMC, Davangere.

Abstract

Background: Pleural effusion is a common clinical condition faced in everyday practice. The first step in the management of pleural effusion is its differentiation into transudates and exudates. Light’s criteria is the most widely used parameter to differentiate pleural effusions but studies have shown that Light’s criteria misclassifies a significant amount of cases. Methods: Study included 125 patients who had pleural effusion who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Duration of the study was 12 months. Results: Accordingly the mean value of this ratio was 0.10 + 0.05 in the transudates group and 0.39 + 0.14 in the exudates group. This difference was found to be statistically significant (p-value < 0.001). This ratio misclassified 5 cases. Among them 2 (3.2%) were transudates that were misdiagnosed as exudates and 3 (4.8%) were exudates that were misdiagnosed as transudates.In this study Light’s criteria misclassified 13 cases in total with a sensitivity of 91.9% and a specificity of 87.3%. Conclusions: Light’s criteria has a good sensitivity and specificity but P/S ChE was the most efficient parameter in differentiating between transudates and exudates in this study.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Reference14 articles.

1. Malyse ML. Non-Malignant Pleural Effusions. In: Fishman AP, Elias JA, Fishman JA, Grippi MA, Senior RM, Pack AI, editors. Fishman’s Pulmonary Diseases and Disorders. 4th ed. Vol 2. New York: McGraw Hill; 2008. p. 1487.

2. Light RW, McGregor MI, Luchsinger PC. "Pleural effusion: The diagnostic separation of transudates and exudates". Ann Intern Med 1972; 77:507-8

3. Light RW. Disorders of the pleura. In: Kasper DL, Fauci AS, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J, editors. Harrison’s principles of Internal Medicine. 19th ed. Vol 2. New York: McGraw Hill; 2015. p. 1716.

4. Reechaipichitkul W, Kawamatawong T, Teerajetgul Y, Patjanasoontorn B. Diagnostic role of pleural fluid adenosine deaminase in tuberculous pleural effusion. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2001;32:383-9.

5. Sharma SK, Suresh V, Mohan A, Kaur P, Saha P, Kumar A, Pande JN. A prospective study of sensitivity and specificity of adenosine deaminase estimation in the diagnosis of tuberculosis pleural effusion. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 2001;43:149-55.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3