COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS OF BLOOD LOSS CALCULATION AGAINST THAT BY VISUAL OBSERVATION BY ANAESTHETIST IN MAJOR SURGERIES

Author:

Himanshu Kiran Khanvelkar1,Shenava Arpith2,Singh Shubhra3

Affiliation:

1. M.B.B.S, M.D., Department of Anaesthesia , Dr D Y Patil Medical College,Hospital and Research Centre

2. M.B.B.S, Dr D Y Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune 411018

3. M.B.B.S, M.D., Department of Anaesthesia, Dr D Y Patil Medical College,Hospital and Resaerch Centre

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate assessment of blood loss is a problem in specialities like neurosurgery and orthopaedic surgeries where large volume of uid is used for irrigating wounds during surgery. Blood loss quantication remains unreliable and inaccurate and hence the debate between surgeons and anaesthetist pertaining to whether to transfuse or not and on what basis remains a problem.We studied 2 methods of blood loss calculation based on observation and calculation and compared them with visual blood loss. Aims: “Comparison of 2 methods of blood loss formula and their comparison based on visual observation by anaesthetist in major surgeries.” Objectives :(1)Calculation of blood loss based on haematocrit. (2) Calculate blood loss based on haemoglobin (3)Persistence of anaemia based on lab haemoglobin values in patients pre and post operatively (4) Comparing formula 1 & 2 to nd the appropriate formula for blood loss against visual loss on gauze and mops and suction. This randomised trial was conducted Materials And Methods: on 85 patients at Dr. D.Y.Patil medical college ,pune. Since different methods were used we dened 2 units measured blood volume loss which was calculated by the Blood volume loss formula and measured hemoglobin mass loss calculated by the hemoglobin mass loss formula. The actual blood loss was assessed Result: visually in terms of number of gauze pieces and mops used. In patients with preoperative hemoglobin less than 12g the mean actual blood loss is statistically similar to Blood volume loss formula while in patients with preoperative hemoglobin more than 12 the mean actual blood loss is statistically similar to hemoglobin mass loss formula The mean actual blood loss is statistically si Conclusion: milar to Hemoglobin mass loss in patients with preoperative hb more than 12 and blood volume loss in patients with preoperative hemoglobin less than 12.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Subject

General Engineering,Applied Mathematics,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Numerical Analysis,Statistics and Probability,Analysis,Information Systems and Management,Information Systems,Management Information Systems,Management of Technology and Innovation,Library and Information Sciences,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Information Systems,Management Information Systems,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems,Software,Astronomy and Astrophysics,Instrumentation,Library and Information Sciences,Communication,Library and Information Sciences,Library and Information Sciences,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Hardware and Architecture

Reference13 articles.

1. Bose P, Regan F, Paterson-Brown S. Improving the accuracy of estimated blood loss at obstetric haemorrhage using clinical reconstructions. BJOG. 2006;113(8):919– 24.

2. Kathariya R, Devanoorkar A, Jain H. Intra-operative hemorrhage: A review of literature. J Med Diagn Meth. 2013;2(146).

3. Solon JG, Egan C, McNamara DA. Safe surgery: how accurate are we at predicting intra-op

4. Abbasi S, Khan FA,Adil S, Et all. Comparison of visual estimation of blood loss with serial hemoglobin and hematocrit estimation in supratentorial craniotomy. The International Journal of Anaesthesia. ISSN 1361-8245.Online.URL:https://www.priory.com/anaesthesia/Blood-Loss.html

5. Beattie WS, Karkouti K, Wijeysundera DN, Tait G. Risk associated with preoperative anemia in noncardiac surgery: a single-center cohort study. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:674-581.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3