COMPARISON OF INDUCTION WITH PROPOFOLAND SEVOFLURANE FOR LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY INSERTION DURING ELECTIVE SURGERIES-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

COMPARISON OF INDUCTION WITH PROPOFOLAND SEVOFLURANE FOR LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY INSERTION DURING ELECTIVE SURGERIES

Published:2021-09-01 Issue: Volume: Page:44-46
ISSN:
Container-title:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
language:en
Short-container-title:ijsr

Author:

Sravanthi Kotturi Anjani¹,Bhavani Geetha²

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor, Department of anaesthesiology, Maharajah's institute of medical sciences (MIMS), Nellimarla, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh.

2. Junior Resident, Department of anaesthesiology, Maharajah's institute of medical sciences (MIMS),Nellimarla, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh.

Abstract

Background And Aims: Laryngeal mask airways are gaining popularity these days in airway management and can be used for various types of surgeries and also during resuscitation. The aim of the study is to compare the induction characteristics and hemodynamic changes associated with intravenous injection of Propofol or inhalational Sevourane induction for LMAinsertion during elective surgeries. Materials And Methods: It is a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled study that is conducted at Maharajah's Institute of Medical Sciences, Nellimarla,Vizianagaram from January 2019 to July 2019. The study consists of sixty patients belonging to ASA grade I & II, aged between 20-60 years of both sexes, undergoing elective surgical procedures, which were randomly divided into 2 groups of 30 each. Patients in Group-A were induced with intravenous injection of Propofol 2mg/kg and inhalation of 100% Oxygen whereas in Group-B were induced with inhalation of 8% Sevourane in 100% Oxygen. The data regarding time for induction, LMAinsertion and hemodynamic parameters were recorded and compared in both the study groups. Results: The mean time taken for induction and insertion of LMAwas less in Group A(100±13.6sec) compared to Group B(120±14.2sec) and this difference is statistically signicant. The fall in MAPand HR in group - Ais also signicant. Conclusion: The quality of anaesthesia provided by propofol is better when compared to Sevourane for LMAinsertion, even though Sevourane is associated with better haemodynamic stability.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Reference17 articles.

1. Hagberg C, Artime C. Airway management in the adult. In: Miller's Anesthesia. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2015. p. 1647-58.

2. Mizrak A, Kocamer B, Deniz H, Yendi F, Oner U. Cardiovascular changes after placement of a classic endotracheal tube, double-lumen tube, and laryngeal mask airway. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23:616–20.

3. Dwivedi R, Dwivedi S, Chourasia HK. A comparative study of sevoflurane and propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults. Int J Sci Study. 2015;3:67–71.

4. El-Radaideh KM, Al-Ghazo MA. Single breath vital capacity induction of anesthesia with 8% sevoflurane versus intravenous propofol for laryngeal tube insertion in adults. Saudi Med J. 2007;28:36–40. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

5. Sukhupragarn W, Leurcharusmee P, Sotthisopha T. Cardiovascular effects of volatile induction and maintenance of anesthesia (VIMA) and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) anesthesia: A comparison study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98:388–93.