Abstract
In a multipolar world, new security threats have emerged, and region-based approaches have been developed to address these new security challenges. In the literature on regionalisation, it is assumed that region-building processes take place under certain conditions and in certain stages. Considering the existing processes in the literature, this study aligns the formation of the Black Sea Region with the understanding of the stages of region-building and proposes new stages of region-building, influenced by the first and second waves of regionalisation processes. In order to analyse Türkiye’s role in the region, the statements made by Turkish political elites (Prime Minister, Foreign Minister, President, and Presidential Spokesperson) during their visits to the Black Sea countries (Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine, Russia, and Georgia) between 2014 and 2023 were subjected to content analysis. This period was chosen to highlight the post-2014 period, which witnessed conflicts that negatively affected the region-building process. Security concerns are important in region-building processes and often lead to the formation of security communities.
Publisher
All Azimuth Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace
Reference75 articles.
1. “2015 Annual Report,” Presidency for Turks Abroad and Related Communities. 2015. Accessed date October 11, 2022. https://ytbweb1.blob.core.windows.net/files/resimler/activity_reports/2015-faaliyet-raporu.pdf
2. “2015-2019 Strategic Plan.” Turkish Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources. 2015. Accessed date November 23, 2022. http://www.sp.gov.tr/upload/xSPStratejikPlan/files/nQbTc+etkb_stratejik_plani.pdf
3. “2019 Annual Report.” Yunus Emre Institute. 2019. Accessed date October 9, 2022. https://www.yee.org.tr/sites/default/files/yayin/yee_2019_v2_31122020.pdf
4. Acharya, Amitav. “Comparative Regionalism: A Field Whose Time has Come?” The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs 47, no.1 (2012): 3-15.
5. Acharya, Amitav. “How Ideas Spread. Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.” International Organization 58, no. 2 (2004): 239-275.