Direnç Antrenmanı Kaynaklı Kas Kütlesi Değişikliklerini Tespit Etmek İçin B-Mod Ultrason, Uyluk Çevresi ve Skinfold ve Uyluk Çevresine Dayalı Enine Kesit Alanı Ölçümlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi
Author:
KESKİN Kadir1ORCID, TOKAT Fatma2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ, BEDEN EĞİTİMİ VE SPOR ANABİLİM DALI, SPOR VE SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ANABİLİM DALI 2. Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in muscle mass resulting from resistance training using B-mode ultrasound, circumference measurement, and circumference-based estimation of cross-sectional area, as well as to determine the predictive value of these three measurement methods for muscle mass changes. Thirty-five young males (age: 22.14±1.37 years, body weight: 76.37±8.38 kg, height: 178.89±6.35 cm, body mass index: 23.88±2.52) with experience in resistance training and currently engaged in resistance training voluntarily participated in the study. The quadriceps muscle thickness of the participants was measured using B-mode ultrasonography, thigh circumference was measured using a measuring tape, and quadriceps skinfold thickness was measured with a caliper at the thickest point (50%). The findings obtained demonstrated that following a 20-session resistance training program, B-mode ultrasonography, thigh circumference measurement, skinfold, and circumference-based estimation of cross-sectional area (CSA) could similarly detect the changes occurring in muscle mass (p< 0.05). The average percentage change was 23.7% for ultrasonography, 2.6% for thigh circumference, and 2.8% for skinfold and circumference-based estimation of cross-sectional area (CSA). Correlation analysis of the average differences obtained from the three measurement methods revealed a high positive relationship between circumference measurement and skinfold-circumference-based CSA (r = 0.826, p < 0.001). In conclusion, it can be stated that changes in muscle mass resulting from resistance training can be detected similarly through anthropometric measurements and ultrasonography. However, the magnitude of muscle mass change may vary depending on the measurement method used. Therefore, when comparing the increase in muscle mass across different resistance training interventions, the measurement methods should be taken into consideration.
Publisher
Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi (Mediterranean Journal of Sport Science)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference22 articles.
1. Atkinson, G., & Nevill, A. M. (1998). Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 26(4), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002 2. Bemben, M.G., Sato, Y., & Abe, T. (2005). The use of anthropometry for assessing muscle size. International Journal of Kaatsu Training Research, 1, 33-36. 3. Budzynski-Seymour, E, Fisher, J, Giessing,J, Genil,P, and Steele,J. (2019). Relationship and comparative reliability of ultrasound derived measures of upper and lower limb muscle thickness, and estimates of muscle area from anthropometric measures. 4. Chen, B. B., Shih, T. T., Hsu, C. Y., Yu, C. W., Wei, S. Y., Chen, C. Y., Wu, C. H., & Chen, C. Y. (2011). Thigh muscle volume predicted by anthropometric measurements and correlated with physical function in the older adults. The
Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 15(6), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-010-0281-9 5. de Koning, F. L., Binkhorst, R. A., Kauer, J. M., & Thijssen, H. O. (1986). Accuracy of an anthropometric estimate of the muscle and bone area in a transversal cross-section of the arm. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 7(5),
246–249. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1025768
|
|