Career Predictions of Students Faculty of Sports Sciences: Perceived Obstacles, Role Model and Self-Efficiency-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Career Predictions of Students Faculty of Sports Sciences: Perceived Obstacles, Role Model and Self-Efficiency

Published:2022-12-08 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:2667-5463
Container-title:Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi
language:tr
Short-container-title:MJSS

Author:

AYDIN Özge¹,ERATLI ŞİRİN Yeliz²

Affiliation:

1. ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ

2. ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Abstract

As with many leadership positions, women hold very few head coaching positions in sports. This does not mean that women do not play sports and do not hold many positions in the field of sports. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between Perceived Barriers and Role Model perceptions of athletes-students and Self-Efficacy on basis of Social Cognitive Career Theory. For this purpose, the sample of the research consisted of 109 female athletes-students. The results, a difference was found between the age of the athlete students, the gender of the coach, the year of doing sports and the sports branch, and the dimensions of coaching self-efficacy and role modeling. Differences were found between the age of the athletes, the gender of the coach, the branch of sports and the dimension of discrimination. A significant relationship was found between trainer gender and self-efficacy and being a role model.

Publisher

Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi (Mediterranean Journal of Sport Science)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Reference42 articles.

1. Acosta, R. V., & Carpenter, L. J. (1985). Status of women in athletics--changes and causes. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 56(6), 35-37.

2. Ayseven A. (2016). Öz Yeterlilik: Bir Kavram Analizi. Turkish Studies, 11/19, 67.

3. Balyan, M. (2009). İlköğretim 2.Kademe ve Ortaöğretim Kurumlarındaki Öğrencilerin Beden Eğitimi Dersine Yönelik Tutumları, Sosyal Beceri ve Özyeterlik Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması, Doktora Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.

4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

5. Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 154–196). New York: Guilford Press.