Peculiarities of Relations in LGBT Community

Author:

Lar'kina Viktoriya1,Pochebut Lyudmila1

Affiliation:

1. St. Petersburg University

Abstract

Introduction. LGBT communities belong to groups with deviant behavior. A small amount of information about the structure of the LGBT community causes the following problems: 1. Disinformation and negative attitude towards the activities of the LGBT community. 2. The LGBT community consists of significantly different groups with different needs and specific problems, which leads to misunderstandings and conflicts of interests within the social movement. 3. Hidden conflicts within the LGBT community have an influence on its activity. The purpose of the research is to study the peculiarities of intergroup relations within the LGBT community. Methodology, methods and techniques. Participants were 134 representatives of the LGBT community. The sample included 34 lesbians, 8 gays, 16 bisexuals, 27 transgender, 15 asexual people, 14 pansexual and 20 genderqueer or non-binary people. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used in the study. The respondents were asked to fill out a questionnaire including the following techniques: 1. Questionnaire “Components of social capital” by L. G. Pochebut; 2. Questionnaire “SEP” by L. G. Pochebut; 3. Questionnaire “The need for affiliation” by A. Mahrebian; 4. Questionnaire “Measuring trust” by R. B. Sho; 5. Open questions. Results. When analyzing the data, the following significant intergroup differences were identified: indicators of “trust” and “goals and values” are lower among transgender people than lesbian, pansexual and genderqueer people. The level of trust among pansexual people is higher than in other groups. “Fear of social rejection” with asexual people is higher than with prosexual people, while the same indicator with asexual people is higher than “fear of social rejection” with lesbian, gay and pansexual people. Gays have lower “fear of social rejection” than transgender people. At the same time, the latter are less inclined to collectivism than cisgender. Lesbians are more prone to affective neutrality than gay and transgender people, while homosexual men are likely to be affective than other groups. Bisexual people are more prone to universalism than other groups. Scientific novelty of the research is determined by the fact that intergroup relations in the LGBT community have not been previously investigated by Russian scientists. Practical significance. To provide effective counselling being in great demand nowadays among LGBT people, it is necessary to understand community peculiarities and relations between groups.

Publisher

Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

Reference52 articles.

1. Boswell, J. (1980). Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality: Gay People in Western Europe from the Beginning of the Christian Era to the Fourteenth Century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press., Boswell, J. (1980). Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality: Gay People in Western Europe from the Beginning of the Christian Era to the Fourteenth Century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

2. Callis, A. (2016). Beyond bi: sexual fluidity, identity, and the post-bisexual revolution. In S. Seidman, N.L. Fischer, C. Meeks (eds.), Introducing the New Sexuality Studies (pp. 231–240). London: Routledge., Callis, A. (2016). Beyond bi: sexual fluidity, identity, and the post-bisexual revolution. In S. Seidman, N.L. Fischer, C. Meeks (eds.), Introducing the New Sexuality Studies (pp. 231–240). London: Routledge.

3. Carrigan, M. (2011). There’s more to life than sex? Difference and commonality within the asexual community. Sexualities, 14(4), 462–478. DOI: 10.1177/1363460711406462, Carrigan, M. (2011). There’s more to life than sex? Difference and commonality within the asexual community. Sexualities, 14(4), 462–478. DOI: 10.1177/1363460711406462

4. Cavendish, M. (2010). Sex and society. New York: Marshall Cavendish., Cavendish, M. (2010). Sex and society. New York: Marshall Cavendish.

5. Chasin, CJ. DL. (2015). Making sense in and of the asexual community: Navigating relationships and identities in a con¬text of resistance. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25(2), 167–180. DOI: 10.1002/ casp.2203, Chasin, CJ. DL. (2015). Making sense in and of the asexual community: Navigating relationships and identities in a con¬text of resistance. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25(2), 167–180. DOI: 10.1002/ casp.2203

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3