Measuring the risk of religious radicalisation of young people: construct and questionnaire

Author:

Zlokazov Kirill1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Saint Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia

Abstract

Introduction. The study of religious radicalisation is an important aspect of counteracting the incitement of hostility between different groups and communities and reducing the level of violence in Russian society. Modern scientific ideas are characterised by multiple meanings that do not effectively counteract the negative impact on young people’s attitudes towards religion and the believers. Academic literature describes concepts and models of radicalisation that differ in theoretical and methodological foundations, based mainly on the material of foreign studies. This situation makes it impossible to develop a construct of radicalisation that could be operationalised for diagnosing the risk of religious radicalisation of Russian youth. The purpose of the research is to verify the theoretical model (construct) of religious radicalisation, as well as to develop a questionnaire based on it, which makes it possible to measure the risk of religious radicalisation of young people through the study of attitudes towards religion and believers. It is supposed that religious radicalisation is formed under the influence of the social environment on the subject’s perceptions of the importance of religion and believers for society and the state. Based on the analysis of theoretical knowledge about radicalisation, facts and information about the activities of destructive religious and extremist communities, a model of religious radicalisation is proposed, including six statements: about the exclusive importance of religion, religious leaders and believers (sacralisation and clericalisation), the need to protect them from changes, interference of non-believers or representatives of another religion (fundamentalism and xenophobia), to maintain relations only with representatives of a particular religious association, including in matters of education, cultural and social development, ignoring or failing to comply with obligations, laws and regulations (socialisation and discrimination). Methodology, methods and techniques. The methodological basis of the research is the socio-psychological approach in the study of human cognition of society (G.M. Andreeva), empirical concepts of religious radicalisation of individuals and groups (A.W. Kruglanski, N. Ellemers, A. R. Schmidt, etc.). The empirical research is aimed at testing the theoretical model of religious radicalisation; development and verification of a questionnaire to study the risk of religious radicalisation. The method of data collection is the questionnaire «Religious radicalisation», structurally corresponding to the theoretical model of radicalisation, including 90 questions grouped into six scales, as well as indicators of religious self-determination and religious behavior. Results processing method: descriptive statistics, correlation, one-factor analysis of variance and confirmatory analysis. Research sample: 874 people divided into Russian (n=336 people), Kyrgyz (268 people) and Uzbek (n=270 people) sub-samples of young people. Results: by means of confirmatory factor analysis of the results of the survey of national samples, the theoretical model of youth radicalisation was corrected. A three-factor empirical model was found to have the best structural characteristics for the Russian sample (χ2=216.5, df=87, p<0.0001, RMSEA=0.067, p=0.008 (RMSEA CI 90% = 0.056-0.078), CFI=0.949, TLI=0.95). The model consists of three scales from the theoretical model (‘Clericalisation’, ‘Discrimination’, ‘Xenophobia’) but includes statements from other scales from the theoretical model (‘Sacralisation’, ‘Fundamentalism’, ‘Socialisation’). The second result was the verification of a questionnaire to study the risk of religious radicalisation among Russian youth. The questionnaire consists of 15 statements, grouped into three scales, has satisfactory reliability values according to the internal consistency criterion and intercorrelations (Cronbach’s α «Clericalisation» = 0.89, r=0.63, p<0.001; «Discrimination» = 0.76, r=0.38, p<0.001; Xenophobia = 0.81, r=0.46, p<0.001). Scientific novelty. The received results expand the idea of socio-psychological preconditions of religious radicalisation, demonstrate a set of beliefs that can stimulate intolerant attitude of young people to religion and believers. Practical significance. The presented methodology can be used for research purposes to study the preconditions of religious radicalisation of young people.

Publisher

Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

Reference35 articles.

1. Бовина, И. Б., Бовин, Б. Г., Тихонова, А. Д. (2020). Радикализация: социально-психологический взгляд (Часть I). Психология и право, 10 (3), 120–142. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2020100309, Bovina, I. B., Bovin, B. G., Tihonova, A. D. (2020). Radikalizaciya: social’no-psihologicheskij vzglyad (Chast’ I). Psihologiya i pravo, 10 (3), 120–142. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2020100309

2. Давыдов, Д. Г., Хломов, К. Д. (2017). Методика диагностики диспозиций насильственного экстремизма. Психологическая диагностика, 14 (1), 78–97., Davydov, D. G., Hlomov, K. D. (2017). Metodika diagnostiki dispozicij nasil’stvennogo ekstremizma. psihologicheskaya diagnostika, 14 (1), 78–97.

3. Злоказов, К. В., Караяни, А. Г., Прокурова, Н. С. (2022). Радикализация представлений молодежи о роли религии в обществе методами когнитивной войны. Психопедагогика в правоохранительных органах, 27 (3(90)), 246–256. https://10.24412/1999-6241-2022-390-246-256, Zlokazov, K. V., Karayani, A. G., Prokurova, N. S. (2022). Radikalizaciya predstavlenij molodezhi o roli religii v obshchestve metodami kognitivnoj vojny. psihopedagogika v pravoohranitel’nyh organah, 27 (3(90)), 246–256. https://10.24412/1999-6241-2022-390-246-256

4. Карапетян, А. А., Тагильцева, Ю. Р. (2017). Принцип интолерантности как психологическая основа экстремистского дискурса: коммуникативные тактики и приемы дискредитации «врага». Политическая лингвистика, 6 (66), 235–240., Karapetyan, A. A., Tagil’ceva, Yu. R. (2017). Princip intolerantnosti kak psihologicheskaya osnova ekstremistskogo diskursa: kommunikativnye taktiki i priemy diskreditacii «vraga». Politicheskaya lingvistika, 6 (66), 235–240.

5. Тагильцева, Ю. Р., Бабикова, М. Р., Ваторопин, А. С., Злоказов, К. В., Лату, М. Н., Порозов, Р. Ю. (2022). Когнитивные интернет-технологии трансформации социального поведения: риски и профилактика: монография. Екатеринбург: Уральский государственный педагогический университет. EDN HLAUOV., Tagil’ceva, Yu. R., Babikova, M. R., Vatoropin, A. S., Zlokazov, K. V., Latu, M. N., Porozov, R. Yu. (2022). Kognitivnye internet-tekhnologii transformacii social’nogo povedeniya: riski i profilaktika: monografiya. Ekaterinburg: Ural’skij gosudarstvennyj pedagogicheskij universitet. EDN HLAUOV.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3