Definition and characteristics of cybercrimes against minors-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Definition and characteristics of cybercrimes against minors

Published:2023-12-27 Issue:4 Volume:2023 Page:105-111
ISSN:2071-8284
Container-title:Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Berestovoy Andrey¹^ORCID,Tsvetkov Pavel¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Russian State University of Justice

Abstract

Introduction: The relevance of the issue is proved by the fact that cybercrimes, including Internet crimes against children, despite the constant growth in the number of registered crimes (in 2022 – more than 522 000, in 2021 – 320 000) have not yet received much attention by researchers and legislators in order to prevent and suppress them. The subject of the study is federal laws and other legal acts regulating social relations and establishing criminal responsibility for committing cybercrimes against minors. The purpose of this study is to analyse the problems concerning cybercrimes committed against minors. Methods: the methodological basis of this study was composed of the basic rules of the dialectical method of cognition, general scientific and private-scientific methods, such as comparative-legal, particularsociological, formal-logical, systemic and historical. Results: the study revealed the relevance of a systemic approach, starting with the legislative fixation of definitions relating to the elements of crimes, which can influence the identification, investigation and solution of cybercrimes against minors.

Publisher

Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

Subject

Urology,Nephrology

Reference15 articles.

1. Номоконов В. А., Тропина Т. Л. Киберпреступность как новая криминальная угроза // Криминология: вчера, сегодня, завтра. – 2012. – № 1 (24). – С. 45–55., Nomokonov V. A., Tropina T. L. Kiberprestupnost' kak novaya kriminal'naya ugroza // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. – 2012. – № 1 (24). – S. 45–55.

2. Галстян Д. А. Экономические преступления в условиях цифровизации и проблемы их уголовно-правовой оценки // Вопросы российской юстиции. – 2022. – № 19. – С. 431–439., Galstyan D. A. Ekonomicheskie prestupleniya v usloviyah cifrovizacii i problemy ih ugolovno-pravovoy ocenki // Voprosy rossiyskoy yusticii. – 2022. – № 19. – S. 431–439.

3. Кучерков И. А. О понятии «киберпреступление» в законодательстве и научной доктрине // Юридическая наука. – 2019. – № 10. – С. 78–81., Kucherkov I. A. O ponyatii «kiberprestuplenie» v zakonodatel'stve i nauchnoy doktrine // Yuridicheskaya nauka. – 2019. – № 10. – S. 78–81.

4. Романов И. В. Понятие киберпреступлений и его значение для расследования // Сибирские уголовно-процессуальные и криминалистические чтения. – 2016. – № 5 (13). – С. 105–109., Romanov I. V. Ponyatie kiberprestupleniy i ego znachenie dlya rassledovaniya // Sibirskie ugolovno-processual'nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. – 2016. – № 5 (13). – S. 105–109.

5. Бутуcова Л. И. Характеристика и сущность киберпреступлений // Алтайский юридический вестник. – 2016. – № 3 (15). – С. 28–31., Butucova L. I. Harakteristika i suschnost' kiberprestupleniy // Altayskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. – 2016. – № 3 (15). – S. 28–31.