Responsibility for theft of non-cash funds and digital currency in the countries of the Anglo-Saxon and continental systems of law

Author:

Smolyakov Aleksandr1

Affiliation:

1. P. G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University

Abstract

The domestic legislator improves the criminal law norms based on, among other things, foreign experience. In this regard, the author considers the approaches of foreign countries to the definition of the subject of property crimes in general and its «digital variants» in particular. The approaches of some foreign countries (Great Britain, USA, Germany, Austria, Spain, France, Poland) to the establishment of criminal liability for the theft of non-cash funds and digital currency are analyzed. Based on the analysis, the author concludes that in the legislation of foreign states of the Anglo-Saxon and Romano-Germanic systems, the subject of property crimes is defined through the category of «property». In England and the USA, property in general (including non-cash funds and cryptocurrency) can be the subject of any property crimes. In the countries of the continental system (in particular, in the Federal Republic of Germany, Austria, France), within this group of crimes, a subgroup of criminal acts that encroach only on things (for example, theft) is distinguished. It seems that in the domestic criminal law it is also necessary to single out a group of property crimes, which will include crimes against property. Accordingly, in order to solve the problem of the inconsistency of the title of Chapter 21 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with its content, since the norms of this chapter protect not only objects of property rights (in particular, property rights), but also property rights (claim rights, etc.) that make up the content of obligations relations . It is proposed to clarify the title of Chapter 21 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, heading it «Property Crimes» (taking into account the studied foreign experience). Thus, non-cash funds, which are not things and which are subject to the civil law regime of property rights, are more logical to recognize as the subject of 2property crimes», and not crimes against property.

Publisher

Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

Subject

Urology,Nephrology

Reference10 articles.

1. Ляскало А. Н. Криптовалюты как предмет и средство преступления // Уголовное право: стратегия развития в XXI веке: материалы XVI Международной научно-практической конференции. – Москва: РГ-Пресс, 2019. – С. 87–92., Lyaskalo A. N. Kriptovalyuty kak predmet i sredstvo prestupleniya // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: materialy XVI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. – Moskva: RG-Press, 2019. – S. 87–92.

2. Харламов Д. Д. Кража в системе имущественных преступных деяний по УК Российской Федерации и ФРГ // Пробелы в российском законодательстве. – 2016. – № 2. – С. 133–136., Harlamov D. D. Krazha v sisteme imuschestvennyh prestupnyh deyaniy po UK Rossiyskoy Federacii i FRG // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. – 2016. – № 2. – S. 133–136.

3. Хисамова З. И. Квалификация посягательств, совершенных с использованием электронных средств платежа // Государство и право. – 2015. – № 3 (33). – С. 127–131., Hisamova Z. I. Kvalifikaciya posyagatel'stv, sovershennyh s ispol'zovaniem elektronnyh sredstv platezha // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2015. – № 3 (33). – S. 127–131.

4. Хилюта В. В. Преступления против собственности и порядка осуществления экономической деятельности: концептуальные основы моделирования объекта и системы : монография. – Москва: Юрлитинформ, 2012. – 202 с., Hilyuta V. V. Prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti i poryadka osuschestvleniya ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti: konceptual'nye osnovy modelirovaniya ob'ekta i sistemy : monografiya. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2012. – 202 s.

5. Лютов В. А. Электронные средства платежа как предмет мошеннических действий по уголовному законодательству Российской Федерации и Китайской Народной Республики // E-SCIO.– 2019. – № 7. – С. 254–259., Lyutov V. A. Elektronnye sredstva platezha kak predmet moshennicheskih deystviy po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossiyskoy Federacii i Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respubliki // E-SCIO.– 2019. – № 7. – S. 254–259.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3