Retribution and humanism of criminal responsibility of persons with diminished responsibility-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Retribution and humanism of criminal responsibility of persons with diminished responsibility

Published:2022-10-03 Issue:3 Volume:2022 Page:65-69
ISSN:2071-8284
Container-title:Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Belichenko Rimma¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Saint Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia

Abstract

Criminal liability of persons with diminished responsibility is one of the actual problems of the general part of criminal law. The author points out how courts take into account diminished responsibility when sentencing. Analysis of court practice shows that humanist approach in this regard is effective not always. It is contained possible ways of taking into account diminished responsibility when sentencing in accordance with criminal law theory and current criminal legislation. It is drawn attention to focusing on enhancing the effectiveness of treatment of persons with diminished responsibility. The article offers to consider consequentialist approach to criminal liability of persons with diminished responsibility. The author shows how this approach is used in foreign science in the study of criminal law issues, in particular – problem of criminal liability of persons with diminished responsibility. It is stated how consequentialism can be used in criminal law theory and practice in regard of criminal liability of persons with diminished responsibility. The study aims to identify effective ways to decide the problem of criminal liability of persons with diminished responsibility based on consequentialist approach. The methodological basis of the research is dialectical method. General scientific methods (systematic, logical, analysis, generalization, interpretation) and particular scientific methods (sociological (survey), formal legal, comparative legal) were used.

Publisher

Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

Subject

Urology,Nephrology

Reference10 articles.

1. Краснушкин Е. К. Преступники и психопаты. – Москва: Изд-во 1-го Московского государственного университета, 1929. – 34 с., Krasnushkin E. K. Prestupniki i psihopaty. – Moskva: Izd-vo 1-go Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1929. – 34 s.

2. Милюков С. Ф. Российское уголовное законодательство. Опыт критического анализа : монография. – Санкт-Петербург: Знание, СПб ИВЭСЭП, 2000. – 279 с., Milyukov S. F. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo. Opyt kriticheskogo analiza : monografiya. – Sankt-Peterburg: Znanie, SPb IVESEP, 2000. – 279 s.

3. Колосова В. И., Поднебесный А. Н. Проблема уголовной ответственности лиц с психическим расстройством, не исключающим вменяемости, в современном уголовном праве России // Вестник Нижегородского университета имени Н. И. Лобачевского. Серия: Право. – 2001. – № 2. – С. 124–133., Kolosova V. I., Podnebesnyy A. N. Problema ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti lic s psihicheskim rasstroystvom, ne isklyuchayuschim vmenyaemosti, v sovremennom ugolovnom prave Rossii // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta imeni N. I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Pravo. – 2001. – № 2. – S. 124–133.

4. Sheffleer S. Consequentialism and Its Critics. – Oxford: University Press, 1988, reprinted 2009. – 300 p., Sheffleer S. Consequentialism and Its Critics. – Oxford: University Press, 1988, reprinted 2009. – 300 p.

5. Bigenwald A., Chambon V. Criminal Responsibility and Neuroscience: No Revolution Yet // Front Psychol. – 2019. – Jun 27. – Vol. 10. – P. 1–19; https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01406., Bigenwald A., Chambon V. Criminal Responsibility and Neuroscience: No Revolution Yet // Front Psychol. – 2019. – Jun 27. – Vol. 10. – P. 1–19; https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01406.