Author:
Khalifian S.,Markman T.,Sampognaro P.,Mitchell S.,Weeks S.,Dattilo J.
Abstract
SummaryBackground: The rapidly growing industry for mobile medical applications provides numerous smartphone resources designed for healthcare professionals. However, not all applications are equally useful in addressing the questions of early medical trainees.Methods: Three popular, free, mobile healthcare applications were evaluated along with a GoogleTM web search on both AppleTM and AndroidTM devices. Six medical students at a large academic hospital evaluated each application for a one-week period while on various clinical rotations.Results: GoogleTM was the most frequently used search method and presented multimedia resources but was inefficient for obtaining clinical management information. EpocratesTM Pill ID feature was praised for its clinical utility. MedscapeTM had the highest satisfaction of search and excelled through interactive educational features. MicromedexTM offered both FDA and off-label dosing for drugs.Discussion: GoogleTM was the preferred search method for questions related to basic disease processes and multimedia resources, but was inadequate for clinical management. Caution should also be exercised when using GoogleTM in front of patients. MedscapeTM was the most appealing application due to a broad scope of content and educational features relevant to medical trainees. Students should also be cognizant of how mobile technology may be perceived by their evaluators to avoid false impressions.Citation: Dattilo J, Khalifian S, Markman T, Sampognaro P, Mitchell S, Weeks S. Medical student appraisal: searching on smartphones. Appl Clin Inf 2013; 4: 53–60http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2012-10-CR-0047
Subject
Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics
Reference20 articles.
1. Steel Media Ventures. App Store Stats Summary. 148Apps; 2012. Accessed October 22, 2012. Available from: http://148apps.biz/app-store-metrics/
2. AppBrain. Android Operating System Statistics. 2012. Accessed December 4, 2012. Available from: http://www.appbrain.com/stats/
3. Apple. Apple's App Store Downloads Top 25 Billion. Apple Press Info; 2012. Accessed December 4, 2012. Available from: http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2012/03/05Apples-App-Store-Downloads-Top-25-Billion.html
4. Velazco C. Google's play store hits 25 billion app downloads, kicks off five day sale to celebrate. TechCrunch; 2012. Accessed December 4, 2012. Available from: http://techcrunch.com/2012/09/26/google-play-store-25-billion-app-downloads/
5. Chomutare T, Fernandez-Luque L, Arsand E, Hartvigsen G. Features of mobile diabetes applications: review of the literature and analysis of current applications compared against evidence-based guidelines. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13: e65. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222161/?tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献