Evaluating a federated medical search engine

Author:

Belden J.,Williams J.,Richardson B.,Schuster K.,Saparova D.

Abstract

SummaryBackground: Federated medical search engines are health information systems that provide a single access point to different types of information. Their efficiency as clinical decision support tools has been demonstrated through numerous evaluations. Despite their rigor, very few of these studies report holistic evaluations of medical search engines and even fewer base their evaluations on existing evaluation frameworks.Objectives: To evaluate a federated medical search engine, MedSocket, for its potential net benefits in an established clinical setting.Methods: This study applied the Human, Organization, and Technology (HOT-fit) evaluation framework in order to evaluate MedSocket. The hierarchical structure of the HOT-factors allowed for identification of a combination of efficiency metrics. Human fit was evaluated through user satisfaction and patterns of system use; technology fit was evaluated through the measurements of time-on-task and the accuracy of the found answers; and organization fit was evaluated from the perspective of system fit to the existing organizational structure.Results: Evaluations produced mixed results and suggested several opportunities for system improvement. On average, participants were satisfied with MedSocket searches and confident in the accuracy of retrieved answers. However, MedSocket did not meet participants’ expectations in terms of download speed, access to information, and relevance of the search results. These mixed results made it necessary to conclude that in the case of MedSocket, technology fit had a significant influence on the human and organization fit. Hence, improving technological capabilities of the system is critical before its net benefits can become noticeable.Conclusions: The HOT-fit evaluation framework was instrumental in tailoring the methodology for conducting a comprehensive evaluation of the search engine. Such multidimensional evaluation of the search engine resulted in recommendations for system improvement.Citation: Saparova D, Belden J, Williams J, Richardson B, Schuster K. Evaluating a federated medical search engine: Tailoring the methodology and reporting the evaluation outcomes. Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 731–745http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2014-03-RA-0021

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics

Reference33 articles.

1. Ketchell DS, Ibrahim K, Murri N, Wareham P, Bell D, Jankowski T, A. Architecture for a Federated Drug Reference in a managed care environment. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996; 413-417

2. Tannery NH, Epstein BA, Wessel CB, Yarger F, LaDue J, Klem M Lou. Impact and User Satisfaction of a Clinical Information Portal Embedded in an Electronic Health Record. Perspect Heal Inf Manag 2011; Fall(8(Fall)): 1d

3. Architecture for Knowledge-Based and Federated Search of Online Clinical Evidence

4. Evidence-based Medicine Search: a customizable federated search engine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3