Affiliation:
1. Portuguese Catholic University, Centre for Human Development Studies
Abstract
Understanding children and youngsters’ participation as a key dimension in educational innovation processes assumes the evolution from a conceptualisation of learners as beneficiaries to another which sees them as partners within that innovation and active individuals, agents of the teaching-learning-evaluation process. The research was centred on this topic, focusing on secondary education, within the scope of an ongoing innovation process in a school located in Porto. We sought to understand how the co-constructed social change is being experienced and perceived by the protagonists and which factors may enable or hinder it. The research was based on qualitative information, assuming it was an exploratory, descriptive, interpretative study. Data was collected through three focus groups – one with teachers and two with students (one with 5th and 9th graders and another with 11th graders) –, as well as an individual interview with the headmaster. The data analysis showed that the transition from conditional or advisory forms of participation to collaborative or co-decision-making ones is neither simple nor immediate. In identifying the barriers to their participation or the factors which can promote it, students have shown to be able to go deeper into the issues at stake and to clearly understand the need to walk a path towards the shared assumption of a participation perspective based on continuous and committed dialogue. As well as allowing an understanding of the innovation process being analysed, this study can also shed light on other research or practical experiences that link student participation and innovation in school education.
Funder
Portuguese Catholic University, Centre for Human Development Studies
Publisher
Participatory Educational Research (Per)
Reference21 articles.
1. Amorim, J. P., & Azevedo, J. (2017). Lessons of the students: The future of education as anticipated by the voices of children and young people. Revista Portuguesa de Investigação Educacional [Portuguese Journal of Educational Research], 17, 61-97.
2. Azevedo, J. (2020). What the literature concludes about pedagogical innovation. Support document for the Theories and Models of Innovation and Change Unit of the Postgraduate Programme in Pedagogical Innovation and Educational Change. Porto: Faculdade de Educação e Psicologia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
3. Argos, J., Ezquerra, P., & Castro, A. (2011). Escuchando la voz de la infância en los procesos de cambio e investigación educativos. Aproximación al estudio de las transiciones educativas entre las etapas de Educación Infantil y Educación Primaria [Listening to the voice of children in the processes of educational change and research. An approach to the study of educational transitions between the Infant and Primary Education stages.]. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación [Ibero-American Journal of Education], 54(5), 1-18.
4. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
5. Carbonell Sebarroja, J. (2008). Una educación para mañana [An education for tomorrow]. Barcelona: Ediciones Octaedro.