Affiliation:
1. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ
2. TC MİLLİ EĞİTİM BAKANLIĞI TRABZON
Abstract
School supervision is generally defined as the process of determining the realization level of performance indicators in schools, and evaluating the quality of education. Supervisors are not directly involved in these activities, and are appointed by the Ministry to assess fulfilment level of these educational activities. In current study, teachers’ perspective related to the supervision in Türkiye was examined in a qualitative research design. A single case study model was adopted to explore the case in depth. The aim of this research was to explore views of 28 teachers on supervision. The study group was chosen through maximum variation sampling technique. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews, observations, and focus group interviews. Thematic content analysis technique was adopted to analysis of raw data. Four themes emerged based on the analysis. These themes were low stakes inspection, high stakes inspection, decentralization, and decreasing in quality. The results revealed that the participants were in a dilemma about the supervision in schools. Moreover, this dilemma was related to the audit of teacher performance by school principal and the supervision of school by ministry inspectors. In addition, through the focus group interviews, the suggestions of the participants with different perspectives on inspection were explored and thus more generalizable themes were produced.
Publisher
Participatory Educational Research (Per)
Reference100 articles.
1. Akbasli, S., & Tunc, Z. (2019). The assessment of primary school teachers’ opinions about course supervision of school principals. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 21(3), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.474511
2. Akyuz, Y. (2015). Türk eğitim tarihi [The history of Turkish education] (27th ed.). Pegem Akademi.
3. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573.
4. Beaver, M. D. (2002). Instructional supervision: Perspectives of middle school fine arts teachers. (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
5. Bilir, M. (1991). The structure and functioning of the inspection subsystem in the Turkish education system (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). Ankara University, Educational Sciences Institution, Ankara, Turkey. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp