Affiliation:
1. T.C. MİLLİ EĞİTİM BAKANLIĞI
2. GAZI UNIVERSITY, GAZİ FACULTY OF EDUCATION
Abstract
The study is a qualitative case study that seeks to determine whether students’ mathematical discourses in solving polynomial inequalities are more ritualistic or explorative. A comprehensive analysis of students’ routines was conducted through the observations of what they said and did (write, draw, and so on) around task situations in a small group. This study’s participants were five 11th-grade students from a public high school. These participants were chosen using the maximum diversity method of sampling. The data for this study were obtained through small-group work. The small-group interactions lasted 80 minutes and were video-recorded with two cameras. The commognitive approach was used to analyze the student routines in this study. The criteria for analyzing routines were the performers’ agentivity /external authority, focus on the goal or the procedure, and flexibility. The findings of this study revealed that the students’ routines were neither purely ritualistic nor sheer explorative. Even those whose routines were ritualistic in all task situations thought about the procedure and asked logical questions about the task. In addition, the findings indicate that teachers can play an important role in encouraging students to engage in more exploratory mathematical discourse. This study contributes to the future research on students’ discourse in the context of inequality.
Publisher
Participatory Educational Research (Per)
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Reference31 articles.
1. Argün, Z., Arıkan, A., Bulut, S., & Halıcıoğlu, S. (2020). Temel matematik kavramların künyesi [Tags of basic mathematical concepts]. Ankara: Palme Publications.
2. Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2021). To tell a story, you need a protagonist: How dynamic interactive mediators can fulfill this role and foster explorative participation to mathematical discourse. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(2), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10009-w
3. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London, UK: Sage Publications.
5. Emre-Akdoğan, E., Güçler, B., & Argün, Z. (2018). The development of two high school students’ discourses on geometric translation in relation to the teacher’s discourse in the classroom. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1605–1619. doi:10.29333/ejmste/84885