National Science Curriculum Documents in Türkiye and The United States: Comparison in terms of Scope and Detail

Author:

YUMUŞAK Güngör1

Affiliation:

1. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversity

Abstract

The processes of educational planning and program development at the local and national levels differ in centralized and decentralized educational systems. In Türkiye, there is a centralized education system, and curricula are created centrally to include all students. In the United States of America, there is a nationally disseminated curriculum framework for science education and a set of standards developed in accordance with these frameworks, while curriculum development continues at the local level based on these two national documents. Seeing how the curricula are designed in the different systems and what details they provide to teachers would be a source for designing curriculum development policies. The purpose of this study is to provide a comparative description of the scope of curriculum documents and the details of the information they contain in two different systems. The research is a comparative, holistic, multi-case study conducted by analyzing curriculum documents at the national level. As a result of the research, national curriculum documents for science education in the United States contain comprehensive descriptions of expected outcomes and content, even as curriculum development continues to occur at the local level. In contrast, Türkiye's science curriculum describes expected outcomes and content in less detail. The outcomes are discussed in terms of curriculum elements, system diversity, and literature.

Publisher

Participatory Educational Research (Per)

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Reference42 articles.

1. Aksit, N. (2007). Educational reform in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 27 (2), 129-137.

2. Aykaç, N., Çelebi Uzgur, B. (2016). Evaluation of Information Technologies and Software Lesson Curriculum According to Teachers' Views (Aegean Region Example). Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 13 (34), 0-0. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/mkusbed/issue/24545/ 259970

3. Bruner, JS (1961). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

4. Bybee, RW (2014). NGSS and the next generation of science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25 (2), 211-221.

5. Çıray, F., Küçükyılmaz, EA, & Güven, M. (2015). Teachers' Views on the Updated Science Course Curriculum for Secondary Schools, Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gökalp Education Faculty. 25 (2015), 31-56

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3