Genetic differentiation within two large phylogroups of the common hamster (<i>Cricetus cricetus</i>) (Cricetidae, Rodentia), the boundary between them, and the population abundance-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Genetic differentiation within two large phylogroups of the common hamster (<i>Cricetus cricetus</i>) (Cricetidae, Rodentia), the boundary between them, and the population abundance

Published:2023-12-12 Issue:4 Volume: Page:481-497
ISSN:2541-8963
Container-title:Povolzhskiy Journal of Ecology
language:
Short-container-title:Povolžskij èkologičeskij žurnal

Author:

Feoktistova N. Yu.¹^ORCID,Meschersky I. G.¹^ORCID,Katsman E. A.¹^ORCID,Meschersky S. I.¹^ORCID,Gureeva A. V.¹^ORCID,Kupriyanov V. P.¹^ORCID,Bogomolov P. L.¹,Kropotkina M. V.¹^ORCID,Davydov I. D.¹,Leonov A. G.²,Surov A. V.¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. A. N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences

2. Buzulukskiy Bor National Park

Abstract

clarification. In the course of our specially organized expedition, tissue samples of the common hamster were collected in 12 regions of Russia and Kazakhstan, including areas at the potential border of the ranges of phylogroups “A” and “E” (“Europe”). Analysis of the nucleotide sequences of the cytb gene of the captured animals has shown that the boundary between these phylogroups runs between Turinsk and Yekaterinburg, further between Chelyabinsk and Kurgan, between Omsk and Tatarsk, and turns to the south, leaving the village of Turgai and the town of Temirtau in the west and the village of Bayanaul in the east. The structure of territorial genetic clades belonging to phylogroups “A” and “E” and the history of their formation were also analyzed. Most of the detected territorial clades were formed during the Late Pleistocene and Holocene. The population dynamics of phylogroups “A” and “E” was analyzed and its decline was shown in 8 of the 12 surveyed regions.

Publisher

A.N.Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS - IEE RAS

Subject

Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference29 articles.

1. Bogomolov P. L., Feoktistova N. Yu., Kropotkina M. V., Surov A. V. Use of Internet resources to estimate the abundance of species contacting with humans (with an example of the common hamster (Cricetus cricetus L., 1758) (Cricetidae, Rodentia)). Povolzhskiy Journal of Ecology, 2021, no. 4, pp. 458–467 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.35885/1684-7318-2021-4-458-467

2. Bragin E. A., Bragina T. M. Pozvonochnye zhivotnye Naurzumskogo zapovednika [Vertebrate Animals of the Naurzum Reserve]. Kostanai, Kostanaipolygraphy, 2017. 160 p. (in Russian).

3. Glotov I. N. Distribution and abundance of rodents. In: Biologicheskoe raionirovanie Novosibirskoi oblasti (v sviazi s problemoi prirodnoochagovykh infektsii) [Biological Zoning of the Novosibirsk Region (In Connection With the Problem of Natural Focal Infections)]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1969, pp. 33–58 (in Russian).

4. Zhivotnyi mir Bashkortostana. Pod red. M. G. Baianova, E. V. Kucherova [Bayanov M. G., Kucherov E. V., eds. Animal World of Bashkortostan]. Ufa, Kitap, 1995. 312 p. (in Russian).

5. Karaseva E. V. The study of the peculiarities of territory use by the hamster in Altay province carried out by capture-recapture method. Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 1962, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 275−285 (in Russian)