Abstract
Two key ideas of scientific explanation - explanations as causal information and explanation as unification - have frequently been set into mutual opposition. This paper proposes a "dialectical solution" to this conflict, by arguing that causal explanations are preferable to non-causal explanations because they lead to a higher degree of unification at the level of the explanation of statistical regularities. The core axioms of the theory of causal nets (TC) are justified because they give the best if not the only unifying explanation of two statistical phenomena: screening off and linking up. Alternative explanation attempts are discussed and it is shown why they don't work. It is demonstrated that not the core of TC but extended versions of TC have empirical content, by means of which they can generate independently testable predictions.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Abduction and Truth;Handbook of Abductive Cognition;2023
2. Theory-Generating Abduction and Its Justification;Handbook of Abductive Cognition;2023
3. Abduction and Truth;Handbook of Abductive Cognition;2022
4. Theory-Generating Abduction and Its Justification;Handbook of Abductive Cognition;2022
5. Abduktive Schlüsse und ihre Rechtfertigung;Erkenntnistheorie;2021