WITHIN-TRIAL CONTRAST: WHEN IS A FAILURE TO REPLICATE NOT A TYPE I ERROR?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

WITHIN-TRIAL CONTRAST: WHEN IS A FAILURE TO REPLICATE NOT A TYPE I ERROR?

Published:2007-05 Issue:3 Volume:87 Page:401-404
ISSN:0022-5002
Container-title:Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Zentall Thomas R.,Singer Rebecca A.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1901/jeab.2007.04-07/fullpdf

Reference21 articles.

1. Effects of response effort on secondary reward value;Armus;Psychological Reports,1999

2. Effect of response effort on the reward value of distinctively flavored food pellets;Armus;Psychological Reports,2001

3. “Work ethic” in pigeons: Reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward;Clement;Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2000

4. Second-order contrast based on the expectation of effort and reinforcement;Clement;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,2002

5. On science and the discriminative law of effect;Davison;Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,2005

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Within-trial contrast or Wagner’s SOP model: Can they both account for two presumed complex cognitive phenomena?;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition;2020-07

2. Using the Implicit Association Test and Choice to Measure the Within-Trial Contrast Effect in Human Adults;The Psychological Record;2017-08-29

3. The sunk cost effect in pigeons and people: A case of within-trials contrast?;Behavioural Processes;2015-03

4. Choice and timing in pigeons under differing levels of food deprivation;Behavioural Processes;2014-07

5. EXAMINATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF CONTINGENCY ON CHANGES IN REINFORCER VALUE;Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis;2011-09