Are Observers Differentially Motivated to Empathize With Stigmatized Targets? An Investigation Using the Empathy Selection Task

Author:

Vanbeneden Antoine1,Woltin Karl-Andrew1,Yzerbyt Vincent1

Affiliation:

1. Institut de recherche en sciences psychologiques, Université catholique de Louvain

Abstract

Research shows that people do not spontaneously show empathy toward stigmatized outgroups, and especially not toward groups lacking both competence and warmth as described in the Stereotype Content Model. However, people do prove capable of empathizing with such targets when required. We hypothesized that this discrepancy is due to a lower motivation to empathize with such stigmatized targets, reflected by people perceiving higher cognitive costs when doing so. In a series of four preregistered studies (Ntotal = 719), we tested this hypothesis by contrasting low competence/low warmth stigmatized groups with other groups in an Empathy Selection Task and measuring participants’ perceived cognitive costs of empathizing. Results replicate previous findings that people prefer to avoid empathy due to its perceived cognitive costs. However, targets’ group membership unexpectedly did not moderate effects. We propose a series of potential explanations for the absence of group membership moderating effects and suggest avenues for future work.

Publisher

Guilford Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3