Impact of the Diabetes Canada Guideline Dissemination Strategy on the Prescription of Vascular Protective Medications: A Retrospective Cohort Study, 2010–2015

Author:

Rigobon Alanna V.1ORCID,Kalia Sumeet2,Nichols Jennica34,Aliarzadeh Babak2,Greiver Michelle256ORCID,Moineddin Rahim2,Sullivan Frank2567,Yu Catherine18ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. University of Toronto Practice-Based Research Network, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Diabetes Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. Interdisciplinary Studies, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

5. North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

6. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

7. Medical School, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland, U.K.

8. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The 2013 Diabetes Canada guidelines launched targeted dissemination tools and a simple assessment for vascular protection. We aimed to 1) examine changes associated with the launch of the 2013 guidelines and additional dissemination efforts in the rates of vascular protective medications prescribed in primary care for older patients with diabetes and 2) examine differences in the rates of prescriptions of vascular protective medications by patient and provider characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The study population included patients (≥40 years of age) from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) with type 2 diabetes and at least one clinic visit from April 2010 to December 2015. An interrupted time series analysis was used to assess the proportion of eligible patients prescribed a statin, ACE inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), or antiplatelet prescription in each quarter. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions were the reference control. RESULTS A dynamic cohort was used where participants were enrolled each quarter using a prespecified set of conditions (range 25,985–70,693 per quarter). There were no significant changes in statin (P = 0.43), ACEI/ARB (P = 0.42), antiplatelet (P = 0.39), or PPI (P = 0.16) prescriptions at baseline (guideline intervention). After guideline publication, there was a significant change in slope for statin (−0.52% per quarter, SE 0.15, P < 0.05), ACEI/ARB (−0.38% per quarter, SE 0.13, P < 0.05), and reference PPI (−0.18% per quarter, SE 0.05, P < 0.05) prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS There was a decrease in prescribing trends over time that was not specific to vascular protective medications. More effective knowledge translation strategies are needed to improve vascular protection in diabetes in order for patients to receive the most effective interventions.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3