Evaluation of a Diabetes Management System Based on Practice Guidelines, Integrated Care, and Continuous Quality Management in a Federal State of Germany

Author:

Rothe Ulrike1,Müller Gabriele1,Schwarz Peter E.H.2,Seifert Martin1,Kunath Hildebrand1,Koch Rainer1,Bergmann Sybille3,Julius Ulrich2,Bornstein Stefan R.2,Hanefeld Markolf4,Schulze Jan25

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometrics, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany

2. Department of Medicine III, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany

3. Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany

4. Centre for Clinical Studies, Society for Science and Technology Transfer, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany

5. Saxon Chamber of Physicians, Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—The aim of this study was to evaluate the Saxon Diabetes Management Program (SDMP), which is based on integrated practice guidelines, shared care, and integrated quality management. The SDMP was implemented into diabetes contracts between health insurance providers, general practitioners (GPs), and diabetes specialized practitioners (DSPs) unified in the Saxon association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The evaluation of the SDMP in Germany represents a real-world study by using clinical data collected from participating physicians. Between 2000 and 2002 all DSPs and about 75% of the GPs in Saxony participated. Finally, 291,771 patients were included in the SDMP. Cross-sectional data were evaluated at the beginning of 2000 (group A1) and at the end of 2002 (group A2). A subcohort of 105,204 patients was followed over a period of 3 years (group B). RESULTS—The statewide implementation of the SDMP resulted in a change in therapeutic practice and in better cooperation. The median A1C at the time of referral to DSPs decreased from 8.5 to 7.5%, and so did the overall mean. At the end, 78 and 61% of group B achieved the targets for A1C and blood pressure, respectively, recommended by the guidelines compared with 69 and 50% at baseline. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes benefited the most. Preexisting regional differences were aligned. CONCLUSIONS—Integrated care disease management with practicable integrated quality management including collaboration between GPs and specialist services is a significant innovation in chronic care management and an efficient way to improve diabetes care continuously.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3