State Differences in the Reporting of Diabetes-Related Incorrect Cause-of-Death Causal Sequences on Death Certificates

Author:

Cheng Tain-Junn123,Lu Tsung-Hsueh4,Kawachi Ichiro5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Record and Information Management, Occupational Medicine and Neurology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan

2. Department of Occupational Safety, College of Environment, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan

3. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

4. National Cheng Kung University Research Center for Health Data and Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

5. Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine state differences in the reporting of diabetes-related incorrect cause-of-death (COD) causal sequences on death certificates in the U.S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study to determine the prevalence of two types of incorrect COD causal sequences with data from the Multiple Cause Mortality File of the year 2004. RESULTS Among deaths in which diabetes was reported as the first diagnosis on line a, b, c, or d in Part I of the death certificate in the U.S., 21% had below diabetes placement error (ranged from 30% in Maryland to 7% in Hawaii) and 11% had above diabetes placement error (ranged from 18% in Kentucky to 5% in California). The net effects of the two types of error ranged from −0.7% in Nevada to 19.6% in the District of Columbia. CONCLUSIONS Because the rates of incorrect reporting of diabetes-related COD causal sequence varied across states, the comparability of the diabetes death rate between states may have been compromised.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference7 articles.

1. Public health surveillance of diabetes in the United States;Desai;J Public Health Manag Pract,2003

2. Improving the comparability of diabetes mortality statistics in the U.S. and Mexico;Murray;Diabetes Care,2008

3. Trends in frequency of reporting improper diabetes-related cause-of-death statements on death certificates, 1985–2005: an algorithm to identify incorrect causal sequences;Lu;Am J Epidemiol,2010

4. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital statistics data available online: mortality multiple cause files [Internet], 2005. Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/VitalStatsOnline.htm. Accessed 8 January 2010

5. World Health Organization. InternationalStatistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision. Vol. 2, 2nd ed [Internet], 2004. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available from http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/ICD-10_2nd_ed_volume2.pdf. Accessed 8 January 2010

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3