HARMONY 3: 104-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide Compared With Placebo, Sitagliptin, and Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Taking Metformin

Author:

Ahrén Bo1,Johnson Susan L.2,Stewart Murray3,Cirkel Deborah T.4,Yang Fred5,Perry Caroline5,Feinglos Mark N.6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

2. Metabolic Pathways and Cardiovascular Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC

3. Metabolic Pathways and Cardiovascular Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Upper Merion, PA

4. RD Projects Clinical Platforms & Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, Herts, U.K.

5. Alternate Development Program, GlaxoSmithKline, Upper Merion, PA

6. Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of weekly albiglutide with daily sitagliptin, daily glimepiride, and placebo. Research Design And Methods Patients with type 2 diabetes receiving metformin were randomized to albiglutide (30 mg), sitagliptin (100 mg), glimepiride (2 mg), or placebo. Blinded dose titration for albiglutide (to 50 mg) and glimepiride (to 4 mg) was based on predefined hyperglycemia criteria. The primary end point was change in HbA1c from baseline at week 104. Secondary end points included fasting plasma glucose (FPG), weight, and time to hyperglycemic rescue. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar among the albiglutide (n = 302), glimepiride (n = 307), sitagliptin (n = 302), and placebo (n = 101) groups. Baseline HbA1c was 8.1% (65.0 mmol/mol); mean age was 54.5 years. The mean doses for albiglutide and glimepiride at week 104 were 40.5 and 3.1 mg, respectively. At week 104, albiglutide significantly reduced HbA1c compared with placebo (−0.9% [−9.8 mmol/mol]; P < 0.0001), sitagliptin (−0.4% [−4.4 mmol/mol]; P = 0.0001), and glimepiride (−0.3% [−3.3 mmol/mol]; P = 0.0033). Outcomes for FPG and HbA1c were similar. Weight change from baseline for each were as follows: albiglutide −1.21 kg (95% CI −1.68 to −0.74), placebo −1.00 kg (95% CI −1.81 to −0.20), sitagliptin −0.86 kg (95% CI −1.32 to −0.39), glimepiride 1.17 kg (95% CI 0.70–1.63). The difference between albiglutide and glimepiride was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Hyperglycemic rescue rate at week 104 was 25.8% for albiglutide compared with 59.2% (P < 0.0001), 36.4% (P = 0.0118), and 32.7% (P = 0.1504) for placebo, sitagliptin, and glimepiride, respectively. Rates of serious adverse events in the albiglutide group were similar to comparison groups. Diarrhea (albiglutide 12.9%, other groups 8.6–10.9%) and nausea (albiglutide 10.3%, other groups 6.2–10.9%) were generally the most frequently reported gastrointestinal events. CONCLUSIONS Added to metformin, albiglutide was well tolerated; produced superior reductions in HbA1c and FPG at week 104 compared with placebo, sitagliptin, and glimepiride; and resulted in weight loss compared with glimepiride.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3