Rationale and Design of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE)

Author:

Nathan David M.1,Buse John B.2,Kahn Steven E.3,Krause-Steinrauf Heidi4,Larkin Mary E.1,Staten Myrlene5,Wexler Deborah1,Lachin John M.4,

Affiliation:

1. Diabetes Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

2. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

3. Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, VA Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

4. The Biostatistics Center, The George Washington University, Rockville, Maryland

5. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The epidemic of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) threatens to become the major public health problem of this century. However, a comprehensive comparison of the long-term effects of medications to treat T2DM has not been conducted. GRADE, a pragmatic, unmasked clinical trial, aims to compare commonly used diabetes medications, when combined with metformin, on glycemia-lowering effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS GRADE was designed with support from a U34 planning grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). The consensus protocol was approved by NIDDK and the GRADE Research Group. Eligibility criteria for the 5,000 metformin-treated subjects include <5 years' diabetes duration, ≥30 years of age at time of diagnosis, and baseline hemoglobin A1c (A1C) of 6.8–8.5% (51–69 mmol/mol). Medications representing four classes (sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, and insulin) will be randomly assigned and added to metformin (minimum–maximum 1,000–2,000 mg/day). The primary metabolic outcome is the time to primary failure defined as an A1C ≥7% (53 mmol/mol), subsequently confirmed, over an anticipated mean observation period of 4.8 years (range 4–7 years). Other long-term metabolic outcomes include the need for the addition of basal insulin after a confirmed A1C >7.5% (58 mmol/mol) and, ultimately, the need to implement an intensive basal/bolus insulin regimen. The four drugs will also be compared with respect to selected microvascular complications, cardiovascular disease risk factors, adverse effects, tolerability, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS GRADE will compare the long-term effectiveness of major glycemia-lowering medications and provide guidance to clinicians about the most appropriate medications to treat T2DM. GRADE begins recruitment at 37 centers in the U.S. in 2013.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference40 articles.

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet, 2011 [Internet]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2011.pdf. Accessed 25 January 2013

2. Long-term complications of diabetes mellitus;Nathan;N Engl J Med,1993

3. Diabetes and cause-specific mortality in a prospective cohort of one million U.S. adults;Campbell;Diabetes Care,2012

4. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012 [article online], 2013. Available from http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/early/2013/03/05/dc12-2625.full.pdf+html. Accessed 8 May 2013

5. National trends in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, 1994-2007;Alexander;Arch Intern Med,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3