Adiposity-Related Heterogeneity in Patterns of Type 2 Diabetes Susceptibility Observed in Genome-Wide Association Data

Author:

Timpson Nicholas J.12,Lindgren Cecilia M.13,Weedon Michael N.45,Randall Joshua1,Ouwehand Willem H.67,Strachan David P.8,Rayner N. William13,Walker Mark9,Hitman Graham A.10,Doney Alex S.F.11,Palmer Colin N.A.12,Morris Andrew D.11,Hattersley Andrew T.45,Zeggini Eleftheria1,Frayling Timothy M.45,McCarthy Mark I.13

Affiliation:

1. Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K

2. The Medical Research Council Centre for Causal Analyses in Translational Epidemiology, Bristol University, Bristol, U.K

3. Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K

4. Genetics of Complex Traits, Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Peninsula Medical School, Exeter, U.K

5. Diabetes Genetics, Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Peninsula Medical School, Exeter, U.K

6. Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K

7. National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, U.K

8. Division of Community Health Services, St. George's University of London, London, U.K

9. Diabetes Research Group, School of Clinical Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K

10. Centre for Diabetes and Metabolic Medicine, Barts, and The London, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, U.K

11. Diabetes Research Centre, Division of Medicine and Therapeutics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, U.K

12. Population Pharmacogenetics Group, Biomedical Research Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, U.K

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—This study examined how differences in the BMI distribution of type 2 diabetic case subjects affected genome-wide patterns of type 2 diabetes association and considered the implications for the etiological heterogeneity of type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We reanalyzed data from the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium genome-wide association scan (1,924 case subjects, 2,938 control subjects: 393,453 single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) after stratifying case subjects (into “obese” and “nonobese”) according to median BMI (30.2 kg/m2). Replication of signals in which alternative case-ascertainment strategies generated marked effect size heterogeneity in type 2 diabetes association signal was sought in additional samples. RESULTS—In the “obese-type 2 diabetes” scan, FTO variants had the strongest type 2 diabetes effect (rs8050136: relative risk [RR] 1.49 [95% CI 1.34–1.66], P = 1.3 × 10−13), with only weak evidence for TCF7L2 (rs7901695 RR 1.21 [1.09–1.35], P = 0.001). This situation was reversed in the “nonobese” scan, with FTO association undetectable (RR 1.07 [0.97–1.19], P = 0.19) and TCF7L2 predominant (RR 1.53 [1.37–1.71], P = 1.3 × 10−14). These patterns, confirmed by replication, generated strong combined evidence for between-stratum effect size heterogeneity (FTO: PDIFF = 1.4 × 10−7; TCF7L2: PDIFF = 4.0 × 10−6). Other signals displaying evidence of effect size heterogeneity in the genome-wide analyses (on chromosomes 3, 12, 15, and 18) did not replicate. Analysis of the current list of type 2 diabetes susceptibility variants revealed nominal evidence for effect size heterogeneity for the SLC30A8 locus alone (RRobese 1.08 [1.01–1.15]; RRnonobese 1.18 [1.10–1.27]: PDIFF = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS—This study demonstrates the impact of differences in case ascertainment on the power to detect and replicate genetic associations in genome-wide association studies. These data reinforce the notion that there is substantial etiological heterogeneity within type 2 diabetes.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Zeggini E, Weedon MN, Lindgren CM, et al.: Replication of genome-wide association signals in UK samples reveals risk loci for type 2 diabetes. Science 316:1336–1341,2007

2. Steinthorsdottir V, Thorleifsson G, Reynisdottir I, et al.: A variant in CDKAL1 influences insulin response and risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 39:770–775,2007

3. Zeggini E, Scott LJ, Saxena R, et al.: Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data and large-scale replication identifies additional susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 40:638–645,2008

4. Scott LJ, Mohlke KL, Bonnycastle LL, et al.: A genome-wide association study of type 2 diabetes in Finns detects multiple susceptibility variants. Science 316:1341–1345,2007

5. Saxena R, Voight BF, Lyssenko V, et al.: Geneome-wide association analysis identifies loci for type 2 diabetes and triglyceride levels. Science 316:1331–1336,2007

Cited by 103 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3