A1C and Survival in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

Author:

Kalantar-Zadeh Kamyar12,Kopple Joel D.23,Regidor Deborah L.13,Jing Jennie1,Shinaberger Christian S.13,Aronovitz Jason4,McAllister Charles J.4,Whellan David5,Sharma Kumar6

Affiliation:

1. Harold Simmons Center for Kidney Disease Research and Epidemiology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California

2. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California

3. Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California

4. DaVita, Inc., El Segundo, California

5. Division of Cardiology, Dorrance Hamilton Research Laboratories, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

6. Center for Novel Therapies for Kidney Disease, Dorrance Hamilton Research Laboratories, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—The optimal target for glycemic control has not been established in diabetic dialysis patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—To address this question, the national database of a large dialysis organization (DaVita) was analyzed via time-dependent survival models with repeated measures. RESULTS—Of 82,933 patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) in DaVita outpatient clinics over 3 years (July 2001 through June 2004), 23,618 diabetic MHD patients had A1C measurements at least once. Unadjusted survival analyses indicated paradoxically lower death hazard ratios (HRs) with higher A1C values. However, after adjusting for potential confounders (demographics, dialysis vintage, dose, comorbidity, anemia, and surrogates of malnutrition and inflammation), higher A1C values were incrementally associated with higher death risks. Compared with A1C in the 5–6% range, the adjusted all-cause and cardiovascular death HRs for A1C ≥10% were 1.41 (95% CI 1.25–1.60) and 1.73 (1.44–2.08), respectively (P < 0.001). The incremental increase in death risk for rising A1C values was monotonic and robust in nonanemic patients (hemoglobin >11.0 g/dl). In subgroup analyses, the association between A1C >6% and increased death risk was more prominent among younger patients, those who had undergone dialysis for >2 years, and those with higher protein intake (>1 g · kg−1 · day−1), blood hemoglobin (>11 g/dl), or serum ferritin values (>500 ng/ml). CONCLUSIONS—In diabetic MHD patients, the apparently counterintuitive association between poor glycemic control and greater survival is explained by such confounders as malnutrition and anemia. All things equal, higher A1C is associated with increased death risk. Lower A1C levels not related to malnutrition or anemia appear to be associated with improved survival in MHD patients.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3