Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006

Author:

Cowie Catherine C.1,Rust Keith F.2,Byrd-Holt Danita D.3,Gregg Edward W.4,Ford Earl S.5,Geiss Linda S.4,Bainbridge Kathleen E.3,Fradkin Judith E.1

Affiliation:

1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland;

2. Westat, Rockville, Maryland;

3. Social and Scientific Systems, Silver Spring, Maryland;

4. Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia;

5. Division of Adult and Community Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE We examined prevalences of previously diagnosed diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes and high risk for diabetes using recently suggested A1C criteria in the U.S. during 2003–2006. We compared these prevalences to those in earlier surveys and those using glucose criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In 2003–2006, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey included a probability sample of 14,611 individuals aged ≥12 years. Participants were classified on glycemic status by interview for diagnosed diabetes and by A1C, fasting, and 2-h glucose challenge values measured in subsamples. RESULTS Using A1C criteria, the crude prevalence of total diabetes in adults aged ≥20 years was 9.6% (20.4 million), of which 19.0% was undiagnosed (7.8% diagnosed, 1.8% undiagnosed using A1C ≥6.5%). Another 3.5% of adults (7.4 million) were at high risk for diabetes (A1C 6.0 to <6.5%). Prevalences were disproportionately high in the elderly. Age-/sex-standardized prevalence was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans versus non-Hispanic whites for diagnosed, undiagnosed, and total diabetes (P < 0.003); standardized prevalence at high risk for diabetes was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks versus non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans (P < 0.00001). Since 1988–1994, diagnosed diabetes generally increased, while the percent of diabetes that was undiagnosed and the percent at high risk of diabetes generally decreased. Using A1C criteria, prevalences of undiagnosed diabetes and high risk of diabetes were one-third that and one-tenth that, respectively, using glucose criteria. CONCLUSIONS Although A1C detects much lower prevalences than glucose criteria, hyperglycemic conditions remain high in the U.S., and elderly and minority groups are disproportionately affected.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes;The International Expert Committee.;Diabetes Care,2009

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988–1994, 1999–2002, 2003–2006 [information online], 2009. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/about_nhanes.htm. Accessed 1 March 2009

3. Interlaboratory standardization of measurements of glycohemoglobins;Little;Clin Chem,1992

4. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus;American Diabetes Association.;Diabetes Care,2009

5. U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division. Table 1: annual estimates of the population by five-year age groups and sex for the United States: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2006 (NC-EST2006-01) [information online], 2003–2006. Available from www.census.gov/popest/national/asrh/NC-EST2006-sa.html.data. Accessed 17 May 2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3