Evaluation of an Algorithm to Guide Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion on How to Respond to Real-Time Continuous Glucose Levels

Author:

Jenkins Alicia J.1,Krishnamurthy Balasubramanium1,Best James D.1,Cameron Fergus J.2,Colman Peter G.3,Farish Steven1,Hamblin Peter S.4,O'Connell Michele A.2,Rodda Christine5,Rowley Kevin6,Teede Helena7,O'Neal David N.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, St. Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia;

2. Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, and Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia;

3. Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia;

4. Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Western Hospital, Footscray, Victoria, Australia;

5. Department of Pediatrics and School of Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, Monash University, and Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia;

6. Onemda VicHealth Koori Health Unit, Centre for Health and Society, School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

7. Department of Diabetes, Southern Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia;

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate an algorithm guiding responses of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII)–treated type 1 diabetic patients using real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Sixty CSII-treated type 1 diabetic participants (aged 13–70 years, including adult and adolescent subgroups, with A1C ≤9.5%) were randomized in age-, sex-, and A1C-matched pairs. Phase 1 was an open 16-week multicenter randomized controlled trial. Group A was treated with CSII/RT-CGM with the algorithm, and group B was treated with CSII/RT-CGM without the algorithm. The primary outcome was the difference in time in target (4–10 mmol/l) glucose range on 6-day masked CGM. Secondary outcomes were differences in A1C, low (≤3.9 mmol/l) glucose CGM time, and glycemic variability. Phase 2 was the week 16–32 follow-up. Group A was returned to usual care, and group B was provided with the algorithm. Glycemia parameters were as above. Comparisons were made between baseline and 16 weeks and 32 weeks. RESULTS In phase 1, after withdrawals 29 of 30 subjects were left in group A and 28 of 30 subjects were left in group B. The change in target glucose time did not differ between groups. A1C fell (mean 7.9% [95% CI 7.7–8.2to 7.6% [7.2–8.0]; P < 0.03) in group A but not in group B (7.8% [7.5–8.1] to 7.7 [7.3–8.0]; NS) with no difference between groups. More subjects in group A achieved A1C ≤7% than those in group B (2 of 29 to 14 of 29 vs. 4 of 28 to 7 of 28; P = 0.015). In phase 2, one participant was lost from each group. In group A, A1C returned to baseline with RT-CGM discontinuation but did not change in group B, who continued RT-CGM with addition of the algorithm. CONCLUSIONS Early but not late algorithm provision to type 1 diabetic patients using CSII/RT-CGM did not increase the target glucose time but increased achievement of A1C ≤7%. Upon RT-CGM cessation, A1C returned to baseline.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Clinical experience with an integrated continuous glucose sensor/insulin pump platform: a feasibility study;Mastrototaro;Adv Ther,2006

2. Accuracy of real time continuous glucose monitoring in the Minimed Paradigm system (Abstract);Mastrototaro;Diabetes,2007

3. Use of the DirecNet Applied Treatment Algorithm (DATA) for diabetes management with a real-time continuous glucose monitor (the FreeStyle Navigator);Diabetes Research In Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group;Pediatr Diabetes,2008

4. Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990;Freeman;Arch Dis Child,1995

5. Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, a measure of diabetic instability;Service;Diabetes,1970

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3